The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Perceived changes in capability during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Swedish cross-sectional study from June 2020
Creator
Meili, Kaspar (Department of Epidemiology and Global Health , Umeå University)
Månsdotter, Anna (Department of Epidemiology and Global Health , Umeå University)
Lindholm, Lars (Department of Epidemiology and Global Health , Umeå University)
Study number / PID
2020-206-1-2 (SND)
https://doi.org/10.5878/f2vy-vq06 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Covid-19 has affected people in various ways, directly through disease and death, and indirectly through disease containment measures. Understanding how the pandemic and countermeasures agaist it impacted quality of life is valuable for policy makers.
To address and compare the various components of quality of life, a suitable framework is needed, which the capability approach provides. This approach measures quality of life as opportunities, compared to traditional welfarist economics that defines wellbeing as utility.
For this study, we used a capability list from a Swedish governmental investigation (SOU 2015:56) that suggested relevant capabilities for the Swedish situation: Financial situation, Social relations, Health, Housing, Living environment, Occupation, Knowledge, Security, Time balance, and Political and civil rights.
The study was performed in June 2020. In an internet-based survey, we quota-sampled 500 Swedish residents from a commercial web-panel, after population proportions of age, region of residence, education, gender.
The survey started with the informed consent statement, followed by questions on participants’ current baseline capability levels in the ten capability dimensions (Low, Medium, Complete). Next followed questions about perceived changes in capability during 2020 in the ten dimensions on a five-item Likert scale (Much less, Less, Equal, Higher, Much higher). The survey ended with a number of background questions on socio-economic and demographic conditions.
Sampling large numbers of participants using a commercial web panel is administratively more feasible and quicker than other sampling methods, such as for example direct sampling from the general population. Also, the response rate may be higher and data handling easier. On the other hand, it is less transparent how recruitment into the study was performed and web panel participants may not be representative of the population. Those limitations should be kept in mind when...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
22/06/2020 - 06/07/2020
Country
Sweden
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Swedish quota-stratified web panel sample of participants provided by Cint. Cint combines different web panels. Age 18-99, living in Sweden.
Sampling procedure
Web panel sample from Cint. Quota-stratified to represent Swedish population after gender, region, and age.
Probability: Stratified: Proportional
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire: web based
Funding information
Funder
Swedish Research Council for Health Working Life and Welfare
Grant number
2018-00143
Access
Publisher
Swedish National Data Service
Publication year
2023
Terms of data access
Access to data through SND. Access to data is restricted.