The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
EU-Profiler: User Profiles in the 2009 European Elections - Respondent-level Data for Austria
Creator
Trechsel, Alexander (European University Institute (EUI), Florence)
Study number / PID
ZA5801, Version 1.0.0 (GESIS)
10.4232/1.11651 (DOI)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Not available
Abstract
The EU Profiler is a Voting Advice Application (VAA) running during the European Elections of 2009. Respondents are situated in a political spectrum, according to their positioning with regard to 30 statements on:
(a) Welfare, family and health: welfare programmes maintained even if taxes increase, privatization of healthcare services, increase in subsidies for childcare;
(b) Migration and immigration: encourage immigration of skilled workers, restrict immigration;
(c) Society, religion and culture: legalisation of same sex marriages, greater respect for religious values in politics, decriminalisation of soft drugs, legalisation of euthanasia;
(d) Finances and taxes: reduction of government spending, tax-raising powers for EU, bail out failing banks with public money;
(e) Economy and work: reduction of workers´ protection regulation, reduction of EU subsidies to farmers;
(f) Environment, transport and energy: support for renewable sources of energy, promotion of public transport, fighting global warming;
(g) Law and order: restrictions of civil liberties, more severe punishment for criminals;
(h) Foreign policy: EU should speak with one voice, EU should strengthen security and defence policy;
(i) European integration; EU integration is good, Austria is better off in the EU, accession of Turkey, more power to EP, less veto power for individual member states, referendum on treaty in Austria;
(j) Country specific items: right of residence for asylum seekers, introduction of comprehensive schools.
Respondents could rate subjective salience for all issues.
An additional questionnaire asks about:
quality of results from EU-Profiler; help to decide about vote; change of vote decision; increase interest in EP election; increase interest in politics; increase motivation to participate in EP election; refrains from participating in EP election; no change of intention to vote; left indifferent; compass useful; previous use of profiler; media use for political information;...
Many but not all metadata providers use ELSST Thesaurus for their keywords.
Keywords
Not available
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
22/04/2009 - 09/06/2009
Country
Austria
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Not available
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Convenience sample (self-selected)
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)
Access
Publisher
GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences
Publication year
2013
Terms of data access
A - Data and documents are released for academic research and teaching.