Summary information

Study title

When bodies and traits collide: Investigating a “Who” system for social cognition

Creator

Ramsey, R, Bangor University
Greven, I, Bangor University

Study number / PID

852523 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852523 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

This collection consists of neuroimaging and behavioural data, collected across four experiments. The project aims to bring together expertise in neuroscience and social psychology to examine the brain systems that link multiple person-features.The first part of the project will establish a neural model of how the brain links bodies with traits.The second part will test how this model breaks down when we perceive social groups. Research in social psychology has shown that we treat members of society differently based on their social group. For example, homeless people and drug addicts receive a reduced status relative to other members of society. Examining how brain responses differ when perceiving social out-groups will illuminate the physiological basis for how we treat members of society.

The story of Jekyll and Hyde highlights a fascinating problem: How do we link together features of a person in order to understand who somebody is? For instance, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde have the same physical appearance, but distinctly different traits. To date, neuroscientists and psychologists have studied separately how we perceive others' body parts (eg, arms, legs) and traits (eg, kind, selfish). As such, it is unknown how multiple features of a person (eg, thin and kind) are linked together to understand their identity.

Methodology

Data collection period

31/12/2012 - 30/12/2015

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

These data were created using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), as well as through behavioural measures of perception. All participants had normal or correct-to-normal vision and reported no history of neurological damage. For more specific details on fMRI and behavioural data collection methods, please see the link below(Related resources), which takes you to an open access article that describes data collection for Experiment 1. Experiment's 2, 3 and 4 follow the same methodology.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/K001884

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2016

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available