The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Predictors of likelihood of sharing disinformation on social media 2019-2020
Creator
Buchanan, T, University of Westminster
Study number / PID
854297 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-854297 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
This dataset was collected as part of a project evaluating the effect of a number of predictors on the likelihood of individuals onward-sharing of disinformation on social media platforms. Four online experimental studies were performed, with characteristics of the messages being manipulated and characteristics of the individuals being measured. The psychometric measures used were the New Media Literacy Scale (Koc & Barut, 2016), the Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (Everett, 2013), and a Five-Factor personality questionnaire (Buchanan, Johnson, & Goldberg, 2005) derived from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP; Goldberg, 1999) that provides indices of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. The methodology of each study is described in the Technical report.Individuals who encounter false information on social media may actively spread it further, by sharing or otherwise engaging with it. Much of the spread of disinformation can thus be attributed to human action. This project explored the effect of message attributes (authoritativeness of source, consensus indicators, consistency with recipient beliefs) and viewer characteristics (digital literacy, personality, and demographic variables) on the self-rated likelihood of spreading disinformation. Four experimental studies were performed (total N=2,634), with characteristics of the messages being manipulated and characteristics of the individuals being measured. The psychometric measures used were the New Media Literacy Scale (Koc & Barut, 2016), the Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (Everett, 2013), and a Five-Factor personality questionnaire (Buchanan, Johnson, & Goldberg, 2005) derived from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP; Goldberg, 1999) that provides indices of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Participants indicated their likelihood of sharing three exemplars of social...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/04/2019 - 31/03/2020
Country
United Kingdom, United States
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
The data were collected using online questionnaires incorporating experimental manipulations.Data were collected as part of a project evaluating the effect of a number of predictors on the likelihood of individuals’ onward-sharing of disinformation on social media platforms. Four online experimental studies were performed, with characteristics of exemplar disinformation messages being manipulated and characteristics of the individuals being measured. In each study a short questionnaire was used to capture demographic information (gender; country of residence; education; age; occupational status; political orientation expressed as right, left or centre; frequency of Facebook, Twitter or Instagram use). The psychometric measures used were the New Media Literacy Scale (Koc & Barut, 2016), the Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (Everett, 2013), and a Five-Factor personality questionnaire (Buchanan, Johnson, & Goldberg, 2005) derived from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP; Goldberg, 1999) that provides indices of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/N009614/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2020
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.