The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.This study aimed to elicit subjective expectations of investment returns and future costs from the rural poor in India, in order to model individual investment behaviour. The bulk of the literature on the issue focuses exclusively on actual outcomes and makes strong assumptions, such as rational expectations and homogeneous beliefs to proxy expectations. This project used a different approach: data on subjective expectations was elicited from respondents to a household survey, and was directly analysed. The information the agents possess and the beliefs they have determined the possible outcomes foreseen and their subjective probabilities. Examination of subjective expectations can be instructive about the accuracy of these expectations. The analysis of how investment behaviour relates to expectations is informative about the functioning of credit and insurance markets: a definition of credit market failure is the presence of expected returns above the market interest rate that do not generate investment activities. The research findings will contribute to the understanding of credit market failures and inform policies to address these.
The household survey was conducted in Anantapur, India, a district in the state of Andhra Pradesh. Interviews were conducted in 67 villages. This study includes data from the second wave of the survey only, for which face-to-face interviews were conducted with 951 households who had been previously interviewed. Further information about the project may be found on the Subjective expectation, expected investment return and investment decisions: market imperfections and misperceptions in rural India ESRC award page.
Main Topics:The questionnaire covered: baseline information (20 questions) household roster (12 questions for each household member (up to 12)) general household characteristics (17 questions)assets (5 questions, questions 4 and 5 asked for 35...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/04/2009 - 30/06/2012
Country
India
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
The households were surveyed more than once, introducing a panel element to the survey. This study currently includes data from the second round of the survey only.
Analysis unit
Families/households
Subnational
Universe
Households in villages in Anantapur, India, surveyed during 2009 and 2012.
Sampling procedure
No sampling (total universe)
All the 1,041 households interviewed for the first round were included in the sample. Further information is available in the documentation.
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Funding information
Grant number
RES-000-22-3461
Grant number
RES-000-22-3461 and ES/J009253/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2011
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.