The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
A Meta-Analysis of the Internal Consistency of the Moral Injury Event Scale, 2021-2022
Creator
Steen, S, University of Hertfordshire
Study number / PID
856549 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-856549 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
The Moral Injury Event Scale (MIES) is a tool for measuring exposure to potentially morally injurious event(s) and distress. While it reported satisfactory psychometric properties in its early development studies, it has since been used in multiple contexts and populations without assessment of its changing reliability or validity. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the MIES psychometric properties across settings and to determine the factors influencing its variability. A systematic search of electronic databases (PsychINFO; PTSD Pubs; MEDLINE; Scopus; Web of Science) was undertaken to identify studies reporting MIES reliability and validity data. A total of 42 records were found up-to-April-2022. Most papers reported Cronbach's Alpha so analyses of other reliability and validity metrics (e.g., test-retest, inter-rater reliability) were not possible. The review found the MIES to be a generally internally consistent tool based on alpha estimates at both Full-scale (α=.88) and Sub-scales (⍺=.82-.92). The review uncovered high heterogeneity and inconsistencies in its administration and modification although figures generally remained above acceptable levels (⍺≥.70). Based on the review, the MIES represents an internally reliably tool for measuring potentially morally injurious events and distress at both Full and Sub-Scales according to pooled Cronbach's Alpha estimates.The Moral Injury Event Scale (MIES) is a tool for measuring exposure to potentially morally injurious event(s) and distress. While it reported satisfactory psychometric properties in its early development studies, it has since been used in multiple contexts and populations without assessment of its changing reliability or validity. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the MIES psychometric properties across settings and to determine the factors influencing its variability. A systematic search of electronic databases (PsychINFO; PTSD Pubs; MEDLINE; Scopus; Web of Science) was undertaken to...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/06/2021 - 01/04/2022
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Other
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
A systematic search of studies reporting the MIES’ reliability and validity was undertaken between June-2021-to-April-2022 via electronic databases (PsychINFO; PTSD Pubs; MEDLINE; Scopus; Web of Science). Boolean search terms and MeSH headings captured Moral Injury (MORAL, MORAL INJUR*, MORALLY INJURIOUS, TRANSGRESS*, BETRAY*) and the MIES (MORAL INJURY EVENT* SCALE) along with articles citing the original design studies (Bryan et al., 2016; Nash et al., 2013). A Google Scholar alert for “MORAL INJURY EVENT* SCALE” was also set-up between June-2021-to-April-2022. There were no date restrictions on the searches.
Funding information
Grant number
Unknown
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2023
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.