The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Individual datasets that do not belong to any series.
Abstract
The survey charting neighbour relations and disputes was funded by the Academy of Finland ('The Future of Living and Housing' programme, 'Neighbour Disputes and Housing in Finland' project). Concerning interaction with neighbours, the respondents were asked how often they visited, spent time with, helped and had conversations with their neighbours as well as how many neighbours they greeted and talked to when encountering them. Social networks were surveyed with questions about how many friends the respondents had in different groups (relatives, study/work community, neighbourhood, hobbies, other group) as well as the number of people in these groups they had difficulty getting along with. The respondents' perceptions of their neighbours, their neighbourhood, and themselves as neighbours were charted by asking to what extent they agreed with a number of statements (e.g. "My neighbours can generally be trusted", "There is a number of different social problems in my neighbourhood", "If my neighbour causes disturbances, I will speak to them directly about it"). Some statements were presented to probe opinions on what good neighbour relations should be like ("Nowadays people care less about their neighbours than they used to"). Regarding disturbances and nuisance caused by neighbours, the respondents were asked what kind of problems they had experienced (e.g. noise from renovation, loud parties, cigarette smoke, gossiping, boundary disputes), how easily they intervened with problems in the neighbourhood, and what their reaction would be if they were told that they cause disturbances to the neighbours. Neighbour disputes and their resolution was charted with questions about the frequency of disputes between the neighbours, own involvement in the disputes, ways used to attempt to resolve the dispute, whether the respondents had ever moved house because of difficult neighbours, and whether the respondents had ever contacted or planned to contact the authorities because...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
03/2012 - 06/2012
Country
Finland
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
People aged 18 and over residing permanently in dwellings in mainland Finland
Sampling procedure
Probability: Simple random
Kind of data
Quantitative
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
Access
Publisher
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Publication year
2016
Terms of data access
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Related publications
Hirvonen, Jukka (2013). Suomalaisen naapuruuden piirteitä asukaskyselyn valossa. Aalto-yliopiston julkaisusarja. TIEDE + TEKNOLOGIA 4/2013.
Virtanen, Laura (2017). Naapuruus ja sosiaalinen pääoma: Kvantitatiivinen tutkimus kaupungeissa ja maaseudulla asuvien suomalaisten sosiaalisesta pääomasta heidän omalla asuinalueellaan. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto. Yhteiskuntatutkimuksen kandidaatintutkielma.