The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
The acquisition of print-to-meaning links in reading: An investigation using novel writing systems
Creator
Rastle, K, Royal Holloway, University of London
Study number / PID
852736 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852736 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
The data collection consists of behavioural measures of performance in laboratory studies in which adults learn to read in novel languages printed in artificial scripts. These studies vary the nature of instruction and the nature of the artificial writing systems. The behavioural measures include learning performance throughout a multiday training period on a variety of training tasks, performance at the end of training on a variety of test tasks, and baseline measures of language and literacy ability. Performance is expressed in both accuracy and reaction time. Text files include full documentation of the archive and methodology. Reading is one of the most remarkable of our cognitive abilities. In a short space of time, most children go from painstakingly sounding out the individual symbols that make up words, to the rapid and seemingly automatic access to meaning from these symbols that skilled readers experience. Literacy has a profound impact on individuals, society, and the economy: amongst other things, it decreases dependency on state benefits and improves participation in the democratic process. Yet, unlike many other of our fundamental capacities (e.g. walking, talking), explicit instruction and practice are necessary in learning to read.
To comprehend text, young children learning alphabetic languages start by translating printed words into their spoken forms, and then they use their knowledge of spoken language to recover meaning. This print-to-sound-to-meaning mapping is often referred to as a sub-word process because words are broken down into letters that systematically correspond to sounds before meaning is accessed. Recent advances in the teaching of reading have shown that phonics instruction helps children to develop these sub-word reading skills. Most children then progress to using a more efficient whole-word process whereby meaning is accessed directly from print. However, we know that around 20% of 15-year-old children in the European...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/04/2014 - 31/03/2017
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
The data in this collection consist of laboratory studies investigating adults' performance in learning to read novel vocabularies printed in artificial scripts. Participants were monolingual adults between the ages of 18 and 40 who were native English speakers. They were sampled from the student and staff community at Royal Holloway University of London, and had no known language or reading disorders. The sample was further characterised by a series of language and literacy measures. These included standard measures of reading, spelling, vocabulary, morpheme sensitivity, and phonological processing. Novel vocabularies printed in artificial scripts were created. Participants learned to read these scripts through a series of tightly controlled training tasks, presented every day for a period of between two and three weeks. The nature of the training method was varied across experiments, as was the nature of the writing system being learned. Learning rates were monitored, and participants engaged in a series of behavioural and associated MRI tests at the end of training.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/L002264/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2017
Terms of data access
Data are openly accessible through the Open Science Framework (see Related Resources).