The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Hočevar, Marjan (Center za prostorsko sociologijo, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Univerza v Ljubljani)
Uršič, Matjaž (Center za prostorsko sociologijo, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Univerza v Ljubljani)
Zavratnik, Simona (Center za prostorsko sociologijo, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Univerza v Ljubljani)
Medved, Primož (Center za prostorsko sociologijo, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Univerza v Ljubljani)
Study number / PID
POV_18 (ADP)
URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADP:POV_18 (NUK)
https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_POV_18_V1 (doi)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Prostorske in okoljske vrednote = Spatial and environmental values
Slovenian Public Opinion (SJM) survey series closely resembles the type of General Social Surveys, well known in other countries. The aim is to provide the scientific community with relevant data about changes in subjective perceptions and attitudes of general population. The topics, which are repeated each year, beginning with 1968, are evaluations of general and economic situation in society, interethnic relations in Slovenia and Yugoslavia, politics, ecology and religion. Since 1989, SJM surveys have been involved in cross-national comparative perspectives by adopting and replicating...
Slovensko javno mnenje = Slovene Public Opinion Survey
Abstract
The first study was carried out as part of the research project CRP - “Slovenia's competitiveness 2001-2006”, by the Centre for Spatial Sociology (CSS) of the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana in 2004. The key question was how to reconcile common social, i.e. public, developmental objectives with people’s individual, personal values. The main purpose of the study was to determine how the population of Slovenia perceives the environment and the space in which they live and the processes within. The second study, called “Public opinion research of social values on space and environment: longitudinal study between 2003 and 2008, was carried out in 2018 as part of the public opinion values survey and focuses on a more detailed identification of the (dis)agreements between the national spatial strategies and the growing reflexivity of individuals concerning environmental opinions and approaches to land use. A more accurate measuring instrument was developed for analyzing the anticipated changes in the population's preferences for dispersed or contiguous settlement. The shifts in the value patterns of Slovenia’s population were examined in relation to the trends of accelerated social differentiation in space and the newly emerging life styles of dwelling, work, mobility and leisure. The data file covers only the variables that occurred in both studies.The first study was carried out as part of the research project CRP - “Slovenia's competitiveness 2001-2006”, by the Centre for Spatial Sociology (CSS) of the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana in 2004. The key question was how to reconcile common social, i.e. public, developmental objectives with people’s individual, personal values. The main purpose of the study was to determine how the population of Slovenia perceives the environment and the space in which they live and the processes within. The second study, called “Public opinion research of social values on space and environment:...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov = Social Science Data Archives
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The data and materials are licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials.