The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Advancing understanding in news information, political knowledge and media systems research: lab study
Creator
Banducci, S, University of Exeter
Study number / PID
851759 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-851759 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
As part of the Advancing Understanding of Media Effects on Political Knowledge project, we conducted a laboratory based experimental study to investigate some of the issues we identified in our secondary data analysis. It became obvious in our analysis that the measurement of exposure to media was critical and has been measured in many different ways. Therefore we tested various measures in an experimental study.In this project we use three publicly available secondary survey data sets--the 2009 European Election Study, 2006, 2008, and 2010 European Social Survey, and 2005-2010 British Election Study Panel and a lab study (source of archived data)--to examine 1) the substantive issue of the relationship between media coverage and political knowledge and engagement, and 2) four different methods to gauge media effects. Our focus is on the traditional media of television news and newspapers; while social media have a role to play their influence is still dwarfed by traditional media. We will link media content data that we have or that are available to each of these surveys in order to estimate the amount of exposure to political information, its subject matter, tone etc. and the consequences for political attitudes and behaviour. These data sets are cross-national, allowing us to examine the interaction of different media systems, characteristics of media content, and individuals.
Our project will show the potential of secondary data for answering fundamental questions about European democracies and the effects of media, particularly timely in an era that spans the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s when there are questions about people's continuing faith in democracy, and when the role of media in contemporary society is under scrutiny through bodies such as the Leveson Inquiry; while also answering the important practical questions of how to apply different methods of estimating media effects, when they are appropriate, the kinds...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
31/12/2012 - 30/09/2014
Country
United States
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Experiment with follow-up survey.The proposed experiment would employ an experimental benchmark, in which randomly assigned subjects were exposed to “media coverage” in a controlled setting. We compared the self-reports of subjects who had previously been assigned to treatment with the self-reports of those assigned to control. The advantage of an experimental benchmark is that the researcher knows who has been assigned to receive treatment. It also means individuals cannot self-select into the treatment. Other (non-experimental) benchmarks may still have error—e.g., misreporting with the “people meters” used to construct Neilsen ratings or social desirability—and individuals choose their own level of exposure.