Study title

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The Survey of Employment Tribunal Applications (SETA98) research project was commissioned by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) and the Employment Tribunal Service (ETS). The study was conducted by the National Centre for Social Research. The aims of the survey were to bring up to date the findings of a previous survey, the 'Survey of Industrial Tribunal Applications', conducted in 1992 (the specific data for this survey is unavailable) on the characteristics of the parties involved in tribunal cases, and to collect more detailed information on what were considered to be the principal factors that determined the outcome and durations of employment tribunal cases. These factors included: the reason for the dispute; the use of workplace disciplinary and grievance procedures; sources of advice and representation; the role of ACAS; the direct costs incurred by parties; and the consequences of the case. SETA98 included five of the major employment tribunal jurisdictions, based on the main jurisdiction identified in the ETS records of the case. These five jurisdictions were as follows: Unfair dismissal; Breach of contract; Wages Act; Discrimination on the grounds of sex and race; Redundancy payments. The sample for the survey was drawn from ETS records of applications, and either the applicant or employer was selected for interview. Interviews were conducted using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI). Depending upon the main jurisdiction in their case respondents completed either a Core or a longer Depth variant of the questionnaires. As a supplement to SETA98, a survey of professional advisors/representatives who had represented respondents during the tribunals covered in SETA98 was also undertaken, thereby providing an opportunity to consider first-hand the views of practitioners. This study is known as the...