Summary information

Study title

Gaining Consensus on Emotional Wellbeing Themes and Preferences for Digital Intervention Type and Content To Support the Mental Health of Young People With Long-Term Health Conditions: A Delphi Study, 2022

Creator

Brown, J, City, University Of London
Bogosian, A, City, University of London

Study number / PID

857049 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-857049 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Background: Young people (YP) with long-term conditions (LTCs) are at greater risk of psychological distress than those without LTCs. Despite this, there is a scarcity of quality digital interventions designed to help improve mental well-being in this population The aim of this study was to determine what YP, parents and health professionals preferred for future interventions. Methods: 26 YP with asthma, diabetes and/or epilepsy (the 3 most common LTCs in YP), 23 parents of YP with LTCs and 10 health professionals mainly in paediatric specialisms (total n= 59) took part in an online Delphi study to gain consensus (set at 75% agreement) on 4 questions across 3 rounds. Participants ordered psychological themes that may be experienced by YP with LTCs by importance and ranked digital intervention types and delivery modes by importance or usefulness. The most common results were reported if no consensus was reached by round 3. Results: Participants preferred a mobile phone app (73% agreement) and a mixture of one-on-one and group support for an intervention (75% agreement). The two highest ranked psychological themes were anxiety (44%) and wanting to appear normal (38%), and the top intervention type was ‘general counselling’ (54% agreement). Conclusion: There was a clear desire for an app to help with the psychological aspects of living with LTCs and for a combination of one-to-one and group intervention elements. Anxiety and wanting to appear ‘normal’ might be two closely linked psychological challenges that could be addressed by a single intervention. Implications: The results will be important to consider for a future intervention, although further consultation will be needed for app development. Patient or Public Contribution: 2 YP with a LTC provided feedback on the study protocol including the aims and procedures of the project. Another 6 YP with LTCs were consulted on an early draft of the study questionnaire (the 4 questions) which was subsequently...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/04/2022 - 01/07/2022

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric
Text

Data collection mode

A three-round electronic modified Delphi (eDelphi) study was used to gain consensus across all participants. A Delphi study refers to a process where participants are asked about an issue and the results of each round are reported to participants before the next round commences, until a consensus is met by all participants. Individuals meeting the following eligibility criteria were included in the study:1) Young people aged 10 to 18 years old with one or more of the LTCs asthma, diabetes and epilepsy. 2) Parents or guardians of young people aged 11 to 18 years old with one or more of the LTCs asthma, diabetes and epilepsy3) Professionals working with young people aged 11 to 18 years old with LTCs from the following fields: healthcare professionals (such as nurses, doctors and clinical psychologists), teachers and social workers Young people and parents/guardians were recruited via a newsletter, an online advert and an online public advisory board of eNurture, potentially reaching hundreds of young people and their families. To increase participation, we also used online adverts in school newsletters for two secondary schools in the Midlands, UK. These schools were independent (fee paying) and were part of the same network of schools. Professionals were recruited through workplaces including the secondary schools above (e.g., for school nurses and teachers) and existing contacts from within the research team, using snowball sampling.

Funding information

Grant number

Unknown

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2024

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available