Summary information

Study title

Khoekhoegowab Lexical Study of Personality - Qualitative interview Responses

Creator

Thalmayer, Amber Gayle

Study number / PID

df5847e5-a0af-47d6-88d6-2749f99ec383 (SWISSUbase)

10.23662/FORS-DS-1216-1 (DOI)

Data access

Information not available

Series

Not available

Abstract

Personality psychology relies heavily on evidence from North America and Europe. Lexical studies, based on the rationale that the most important psychological distinctions between people will be encoded in the natural languages, can provide input from underrepresented contexts by defining locally-relevant personality concepts and their structure. We report the results of a psycholexical study in Khoekhoegowab, the most widely spoken of southern Africa’s (non-Bantu) click languages. It includes the largest sample of any lexical study conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa, is the first anywhere to include qualitative interviews to systematically assess the interpretability of terms, and is one of few to rely on a more representative community sample of adults rather than students. Refinement of the survey included frequency-of-use ratings by native speakers from throughout Namibia and input on relevance to personality by those with a psychology degree. The survey was administered by interview to 622 participants by a team of 15 schoolteachers of Khoekhoegowab. The 11 dimensions of the optimal local model were labelled: Intemperance, Prosocial Diligence, Intrusive Gossip, Good Nature, Bad Temper, Predatory Aggression, Haughty Self-Respect, Vanity/Egotism, and Fear versus Courage. A Big One model of evaluation was strongly replicated. Moderate replication was found for the Big Two, Pan-Cultural Three, and a hypothesized pan-African model based on prior lexical results in two languages. Replication criteria were not achieved for the Big Five, Big Six, or South African Personality Inventory models. What results suggest about the local cultural context and about culturally specific aspects of the imported models are discussed.

Keywords

Not available

Methodology

Data collection period

Not available

Country

Europe, Western Europe, Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, Switzerland, Namibia

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Not available

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Not available

Data collection mode

Not available

Access

Publisher

FORS

Publication year

2020

Terms of data access

Additional Restrictions: Academic research and teaching only
Special permission: With prior agreement of author

Related publications

Not available