Summary information

Study title

Activities and Power of Workplace Representatives on the Railway : a Comparative Study, 1979-1980

Creator

Edwards, C. Y., North East London Polytechnic, Department of Sociology

Study number / PID

2149 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-2149-1 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The research replicates a study of the activities and power of workplace union representatives already completed in the coal industry. The objectives of the study on the railway are as follows: 1. Firstly, to test further the methodology for the comparative analysis of workplace power developed in the coal study. 2. Using this methodology to identify the range and amount of power of Local Departmental Committee representatives (managers and `shop stewards') over workplace activity. 3. To compare their activities and power with that of local NUM representatives in the coal industry. 4. To compare the activities and power of the NUR Local Departmental Committee (LDC) representatives with those of ASLEF LDC representatives. 5. To identify the structural, economic and attitudinal factors related to their activities and their power in order to explore further the relationships identified in the coal industry study.Main Topics:Variables The data consists of a set of secondary variables created from a number of primary data sets:- (1) Measures of power derived from a decision analysis. (2) Measures of size, <i>performance</i>, industrial action from <i>background</i> data collected for each location. (3) A questionnaire on attitudes to work, union and the LDC., etc., sent to a sample of ordinary railmen (i.e. not LDC representatives). (4) Questionnaires sent to all LDC representatives on their role, relationships, attitudes, etc. (5) A questionnaire handed to a spokesman representative from each LDC concerning role, relationships, attitudes, etc. (6) A questionnaire handed to management chairman of LDCs concerning role, relationships, attitudes, etc (7) An interview schedule administered to the management chairman and LDC spokesman about their involvement and influence in decision making. Measurement Scales For measurements of power, see Edwards, C.Y., 'Measuring union power:...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/09/1979 - 01/08/1980

Country

Great Britain

Time dimension

Cross-sectional (one-time) study

Analysis unit

Institutions/organisations
Subnational
Trade union officers
Managers

Universe

Local Departmental Committee representatives of British Rail in England, Scotland and Wales and the local managers with whom they bargain.

Sampling procedure

Forty locations were chosen at random from five operational British Rail Regions. An attempt was made to sample all LDC representative and managers at these locations.

Kind of data

Not available

Data collection mode

Face-to-face interview
Postal survey

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

1986

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.

Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.

Related publications

  • Edwards, C. (1981) Progress report to the SSRC [Research report], : SSRC.
  • Edwards, C. (1987) 'Formal industrial relations and workplace power : : a study on the railway', Journal of Management Studies
  • Edwards, C. (1981) Formal procedure and bargaining power : : an examination of workplace industrial relations in the railway industry [Research report], : North East London Polytechnic, Department of Sociolog.
  • Edwards, C. (1981) The role of LDC representatives in industrial relations : : report to NUR, ASLEF and BRB [Research report], : NUR, ASLEF and BRB.
  • Edwards, C. (1982) End of grant report to the SSRC [Research report], : SSRC.