The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Asexual lives: Everyday experiences, relationships and stories of becoming
Creator
Scott, S, University of Sussex
McDonnell, L, University of Sussex
Study number / PID
851821 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-851821 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This data collection consists of 45 biographical narrative interviews conducted by Skype and face-to-face with participants who either self-identified as asexual, or felt the term described them in some way or who experienced little or no sexual desire/attraction.
Participants were sought from online communities such as Aven – the main asexuality online community. We also advertised for research participants through local LGBTQ groups, Sussex and Glasgow Universities, libraries and relevant community centres/hotspots. In total, 50 participants were interviewed and 27 people also completed a diary. 23 people filled out the diary-questionnaire. Only 45 participants agreed that their interview data could be transferred to the UK Data Archive.
This project sought to understand asexual identities, lifestyles and intimate practices using a Symbolic Interactionist approach. The study focused on two research questions:
What does it mean to be asexual for different types of people and how do diverse asexual identities develop over time?
What are the practices of intimacy for asexual people including those in relationships with asexual or sexual partners?
To answer our research questions we conducted biographical narrative interviews, collected solicited diaries and diary-questionnaires. The biographical narrative interviews explored the individual’s experience of being asexual over time; the life events, experiences and relationships that shaped how participants saw themselves and the trajectory of their lives. The participant diaries collected information about the everyday practices of intimacy i.e. the events, experiences, interactions when participants felt close/intimate with someone, a pet or anything else. The third stage of data collection involved a diary-questionnaire that asked participants about their experience of doing the diary. The data was analysed in a number of ways, some of these using the computer software program NVivo 10.
This...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/03/2013 - 28/02/2015
Country
United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Sweden, Australia
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
The sampling process involved advertising for participants through online communities such as Aven.org, local LGBTQ groups in two UK cities, an article written for Huffington Post and also hard copy adverts in local libraries and community organisations. We were keen to minimise the effects of sampling from organisations such as AVEN which in other studies had produced samples skewed towards younger women, with higher levels of education, middle class, white and American (e.g. Scherrer, 2008) so we first contacted those who were male and over the age of 30 yrs. The rest of the sample was decided by a random number generator applied to the remaining group of participants.In terms of information given in our pre interview, short demographic information form, and in relation to the whole cohort of 50 people, the majority of participants normally resided in the US (n=24) and the UK (n=20), with 3 residing in Sweden, 2 in Canada and 1 in Australia. In terms of gender identification, 33 identified as female, 8 as male, 2 as agender, 2 as androgynous, 1 as female boarding on agender, 1 as male unsure, 1 as transgender/gender fluid and 2 people did not respond to the question. The sample was relatively youthful: 23 participants were 18-23 yrs, 15 were 24-29 yrs, 7 were 30-47 yrs, 2 were 48-59 yrs and we did not have data on 3 participants. Participants were also relatively well educated with highest levels of education reported being: college/university degree (n=24), A levels (n=11), completing High School (n=10), post graduate qualification (n=3) and missing data (n=2). Participants were not ethnically diverse with 39 people describing their ethnic identity as white/Caucasian/, 2 as British, 2 as Jewish, 1 as Native American, 2 as mixed race and there was not data for 4 people. The large majority of people reported their relationship status as single (n=36), 10 people reported being in relationships, 2 in committed platonic relationships, 1 was dating and one was in a polyamorous relationship.