The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Virtual Touch: Sensing and Feeling with Ultrasound, 2019-2020
Creator
Moore, W, University of Liverpool
Study number / PID
855714 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-855714 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
The sense of touch codes the detection and properties of physical objects on the body via mechanoreceptors within the skin. Technological advancements, such as ultrasonic haptic devices, are now able to ‘touch without touching’, claiming this is virtual touch. An initial aim of the study was to investigate subjective intensity and pleasantness ratings of ultrasound stimulation and the influence of top-down factors using the Touch Experience and Attitudes QuestionnaireTouch Experience and Attitudes Questionnaire. Self-reported intensity and pleasantness ratings were measured in response to ultrasound stimuli. A second aim was to record from individual low threshold mechanoreceptors using the technique of microneurography in an attempt to determine which mechanoreceptors are activated by ultrasound stimulation of the skin. The major findings here were that microneurography found Slowly-adapting type-I and Slowly-adapting type-II units did not respond to ultrasound stimuli; intensity and pleasantness ratings were significantly different between age groups. Ultrasound can produce a variety of sensations with varying intensity and pleasantness ratings. A limitation of the study was the unexpected force difference generated between modulations. These findings have implications for mid-air haptics, somatosensory affective research, and virtual reality. Future research should focus on microneurography investigation of fast-adapting fibre responses to ultrasound.The sense of touch codes the detection and properties of physical objects on the body via mechanoreceptors within the skin. Technological advancements, such as ultrasonic haptic devices, are now able to ‘touch without touching’, claiming this is virtual touch. An initial aim of the study was to investigate subjective intensity and pleasantness ratings of ultrasound stimulation and the influence of top-down factors using the Touch Experience and Attitudes QuestionnaireTouch Experience and Attitudes...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2019 - 01/05/2020
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Experiment one: Utilising an opportunity sampling method, Liverpool John Moores University students were recruited via an online booking system (SONA) and invited to the psychology lab. Participants read a participant information sheet before completing a consent form, demographic questionnaire and the Touch Experience and Attitudes Questionnaire. Finally, participants sat in the chair with their left palm up, supported on a suction cushion. The participants underwent a familiarisation trial where they received each stimulus once, in order to reduce novelty effects and to become tuned to the sensation of the experimenter’s hand was placed under the focal point and lasers were aimed at the point of sensation. The haptic device position was adjusted so that the focus point targeted the participant’s palm (fig 1). Ear defenders were worn by participants during the delivery of eight stimuli, each lasting 10 seconds in the order shown in table 2, and the start and end of stimulus delivery was marked by a short beep sound played through the laptop speakers. A 20 second pause was provided between stimuli allowing time for participant VAS responses, therefore amounting to 4m30sec total run time. Following stimuli two and six the device was manually moved to the arm and palm, respectively. Experiment two: Using Microneurography, nerve type classification was determined by inserting the electrode percutaneously, 1-3cm proximal to the cubital fold, into the lateral antebrachial nerve. Sensations down the arm produced by weak electrical pulses (0.1-3mA) indicated the electrode was interfascicular. Nerve fibre tuning characteristics and receptive field size were identified using Von-Frey hairs (<5mN), tuning fork vibration and gentle stroking touch. Nerve activation was record in response to all ultrasound outputs and modulations.
Funding information
Grant number
Unknown
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2022
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.