Summary information

Study title

The politics of competence: Longitudinal and comparative analysis

Creator

Green, J, The University of Manchester

Study number / PID

851033 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-851033 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Researchers have previously analysed voters' ratings of parties on policy competence using data from single election studies in recent election years. Data have not been available over time, or cross-nationally. This project will gather over time data from opinion pollsters in four countries; the UK, the US, Canada and Australia, about voters' ratings of parties on policy competence and handling. Using an established method of estimation and aggregation, these data will provide continuous time measures of policy competence spanning periods up to six decades. Analysing these data will enable scholars to understand how parties gain and lose reputations for policy competence, how policy competence ratings may decline during a period of government, how the concept varies across countries, and how policy competence ratings change with other performance indicators, for example, leader ratings, events and economic outcomes. The award holders will make the competence indices available, alongside all other publicly available and relevant aggregate level variables. They will provide technical background information about the data and measures, conduct impact and dissemination activities, and will produce preliminary findings using the data to begin to answer these research questions, and to begin initial work for a book proposal.

Topics

Keywords

Methodology

Data collection period

01/01/2012 - 31/12/2012

Country

United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

Aggregate public opinion data was collected on party issue handling for the US, UK, Canada and Australia from a wide range of sources such as national election studies, commercial pollsters, and academic surveys. The common underlying movement in public evaluations of party issue handling was calculated using James Stimson's 'dyad-ratios algorithm' to construct a measure of 'macro-competence' (for a full discussion of the measure, see Green & Jennings, 2012, British Journal of Political Science).

Funding information

Grant number

RES-000-22-4616

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2013

Terms of data access

The 'macro-competence' series is an aggregate series, estimated from existing survey data, but the dataset does not include details of any individual surveys where there might be copyright issues. The data do not raise any ethical concerns because it is aggregate-level and does not relate to individual respondents.

Related publications

Not available