The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Voter Perceptions of Disabled Candidates in Britain and the US, 2020-2021
Creator
Reher, S, University of Strathclyde
Study number / PID
856843 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-856843 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
Much is known about the effects of candidate characteristics, such as gender, age, and ethnicity, on voter perceptions and support. Meanwhile, very little research on citizens' attitudes towards and stereotypes about disabled candidates and politicians has been conducted. This dataset provides the opportunity to explore how citizens perceive disabled candidates. The data comes from a survey conducted in Britain and the US in 2020 and 2021 among representative samples of the populations of approx. 3,000 respondents in each country. The surveys include two survey experiments with conjoint designs, where respondents are presented with vignettes describing two fictional candidates competing for election. A range of candidate attributes are randomly varied, including whether candidates are blind, Deaf, wheelchair users, or not described as disabled. The design allows identifying the effects of disability and other candidate attributes on respondents' perceptions of the candidates' traits, issue priorities, issue competence, and representative links. The surveys also include a range of measures of respondents' socio-demographic characteristics, in particular their experience with disability, and political attitudes.This project asks how voters perceive disabled election candidates and whether these perceptions influence their vote choice. While almost one in five people in the UK have a disability, the numbers are much lower among politicians, with currently only five MPs known to be disabled. This under-representation might hamper the representation of the interests of disabled citizens and dampen their political engagement. It also indicates unequal access to political office. While the underlying reasons are manifold, potential prejudices among voters not only pose an electoral hurdle but might also prevent disabled candidates from running and parties from nominating them. Understanding how voters perceive and evaluate disabled candidates is thus essential to...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
20/05/2020 - 07/02/2021
Country
United Kingdom, United States
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
The data come from a survey conducted in the UK (Wave 1: 20 May - 6 July 2020; Wave 2: 8 January - 5 February 2021) and the US (8 January - 7 February 2021). It was conducted online through the platform Qualtrics, who also provided the samples from opt-in online panels. The quota samples (UK: N=2,998; US: N=3,011) are representative of the populations along age groups, gender, and region. The survey included two near-identical survey experiments with conjoint designs. The experiment presented respondents with vignettes describing fictional election (House of Commons/Representatives) candidates, including a set of socio-demographic and political attributes which were randomly varied, and asked respondents to evaluate them. The effects of candidate characteristics on respondent evaluations can be analysed. The survey includes a range of socio-demographic and attitudinal variables, focusing particularly on disability.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/S015469/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.