Summary information

Study title

Rural Finland 2013: Rural Development Specialists

Creator

Aho, Pauliina (Taloustutkimus)
Rahkonen, Juho (Taloustutkimus)

Study number / PID

FSD2931 (FSD)

urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2931 (URN)

10.60686/t-fsd2931 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Rural Finland

The first two Rural Finland barometers were conducted as part of the Landmarks Programme (2010-2012) of the Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra. The barometers provide information on the relationship of the Finns to the countryside and on their ideas for its future. Respondents are Finnish citizens, business managers, public sector decision-makers, media representatives, and countryside experts. FSD collections contain data from 2009 to 2013.

Abstract

The survey studied public opinion and experiences of the countryside in Finland and beliefs about the significance, development and future of rural areas. This stage of the study surveyed the perceptions of rural development specialists. The study is a continuation of the surveys conducted in the Landmarks Programme of the Finnish Innovation Fund (Sitra) in 2009 and 2011. First, the respondents were asked to what extent they connected certain qualities and issues to countryside and to urban areas (e.g. burden on the public economy, environmental-friendly way of life, social exclusion, good life, authenticity, culture). Images of the countryside were charted by asking what kinds of places corresponded to their view of the countryside and which areas they saw as part of the countryside (e.g. holiday villages in rural areas, rural population centres, nature areas, rural areas dominated by agricultural areas). The experience of urban/rural identity was examined by asking whether the respondents thought themselves as city or rural residents and how important this identity was to them. The respondents were presented with a number of statements relating to the countryside, its image and future development and significance. Some questions covered what the respondents would like the countryside to be like in 2025, what countryside meant to them at the time of the survey and what they believed it would mean to them in ten years' time. Further questions explored the respondents' beliefs about whether the significance of rural areas would grow or diminish in Finland. Some questions investigated what kind of business ventures they thought could have potential in the countryside (e.g. logistics services, renewable energy production, tourism), and to what extent they agreed with a number of statements related to entrepreneurship both in general and in the countryside. Background variables included the respondent's year of birth, gender, education, political party choice if...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

17/09/2013 - 10/10/2013

Country

Finland

Time dimension

Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Advisory Board for Regional and Structural Policy (ARNE); Directors, Business Development Managers, Rural Development Managers, Project Managers, and Business Experts in the Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment; local community representatives/ombudsmen; Regional Development Directors and Rural Development Managers of Regional Councils; Rural Development Unit; Rural Policy Committee (YTR); professors of rural studies; Rural Network Unit; Association of Regional Development Agencies in Finland (SEKES); local action groups; secretariat and theme networks of the Rural Policy Committee (YTR).

Excludes: the Åland Islands

Sampling procedure

Non-probability: Purposive

Kind of data

Quantitative

Data collection mode

Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)

Access

Publisher

Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Publication year

2014

Terms of data access

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Related publications

  • Kuhmonen, Tuomas (2015). Maaseudun mahdollisuudet liiketoiminnassa ja yrittäjyydessä. Maaseutu 2014 -barometri [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. http://www.tem.fi/files/41863/Maaseudun_mahdollisuudet_liiketoiminnassa_ja_yrittajyydessa.pdf [viitattu 18.12.2015]
  • Kuhmonen, Tuomas (2015). Kohti erilaisia alueita - alueiden vetovoimaprofiilit tulevaisuudessa. Maaseutu 2014 -barometri [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. http://www.tem.fi/files/41865/Kohti_erilaisia_alueita_alueiden_vetovoimaprofiili_tulevaisuudessa.pdf [viitattu 18.12.2015]
  • Ilmonen, Kari (2015). Maaseudun paikkaperustainen kehittäminen kulttuurin, hyvinvoinnin ja yrittäjyyden näkökulmasta. Maaseutu 2014 -barometri [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. http://www.tem.fi/alueiden_kehittaminen/kansallinen_alueiden_kehittaminen/maaseutupolitiikka/maaseutubarometri/maaseutu_2014_-barometri/maaseudun_paikkaperustainen_kehittaminen_kulttuurin_hyvinvoinnin_ja_yrittajyyden_nakokulmasta [viitattu 18.12.2015]
  • Aho, Pauliina & Rahkonen, Juho (2014). Maaseutubarometri 2014. Tutkimusraportti. Helsinki: Taloustutkimus [verkkodokumentti]. http://mmm.fi/documents/1410837/1516647/Maaseutubarometri+2014_LOPPURAPORTTI.pdf/3d544033-79ea-453d-9406-4ba37ffdf4aa [viitattu 7.10.2016].