Summary information

Study title

Human Rights Big Data and Technology: Digital Policing and Human Rights, 2023

Creator

McGregor, L, University of Essex
Fussey, P, University of Essex

Study number / PID

856742 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-856742 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

The main project aims were to examine the human rights implications of rapidly developing technologies. As noted above, in an increasingly digitised world, technological developments and the collection, storage and use of 'big data' pose unprecedented challenges for the protection of human rights. The aim of the project was to examine the intersection of such technological developments and the ideals of human rights protection. The work focused on both positive and negative aspects of this relationship. As noted above, the core research aims were organised on these issues that cut across the threats and opportunities:1) How is the use of ICT and big data shaping the content and scope of rights? (2) How does the use of ICT and big data shape operational practices across state and non-state activities? What new theoretical questions and implications for human rights are generated? (3) What methodologies are needed to identify and document the misuse of modern technologies and the failure to comply with rights-based obligations? (4) How can the use of ICT and big data best support evidence-based approaches to human rights protection and advocacy? (5) What possibilities and limitations exist for regulating the collection, storage and use of ICT and big data by states and non-state actors? The deposited data largely focuses on interviews with law enforcement and security agency representatives about uses of digital technology. We found that an enthusiastic embrace of technnology often existed yet this was not always accompanied by the development of codes of practice, regulatory frameworks and operational guidence on how they should be used. In addition to a potential regulatory vacuum, such disconnects also placed additional burdens on law enforcement themselves as they sought to apply existing rules and regulations. This is something we have described in publications as 'surveillance arbitration'. We also include interviews with civil society actors and lawyers...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

30/09/2015 - 29/06/2023

Country

United Kingdom, United States

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Organization

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

The main data collection tools involved qualitative interviewing, focus groups and non-participatnt observation. This allowed participants to frame their experiences through their own experiential lens and professional vernaculars. The semi sructured element enabled a degree of comparison. By the nature of the work, many participants work in settings that requre operational secrecy. Partiipant recruitment was therefore acheived through an incremental process of snowball sampling. Initial gatekeepers were recruited through multiple means. This included leveraging existing contacts, presenting at professional meetings, direct engagement with regulatory bodies and hiring interlocateurs as consultants on the project.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/M010236/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2024

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.

Related publications

Not available