The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Public acceptance of policy instruments to reduce forest loss: Exploring cross-national variation in East Africa
Creator
Hepelwa, Aloyce (University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania)
Ndwiga, Michael (University of Nairobi, Kenya)
Okumu, Bosco (African Population and Health Research Centre )
Teklewold, Hailemariam (Environment and Climate Research Center, Policy Studies Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)
Babyenda, Peter (Makerere University. Kampala, Uganda. )
Ntiyakunze, Matilda (Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam)
Stage, Jesper (Luleå University of Technology)
Slunge, Daniel (Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
Study number / PID
2024-446-1 (SND)
https://doi.org/10.5878/4tag-0221 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
We collected data in five East African countries (Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia and Rwanda) focusing on citizens’ perceptions on forest loss-reducing policy instruments along with the role of socio-economic factors on these perceptions. The questionnaire included questions that asked about their opinion about a ban or tax on cutting trees in public and community forests, and a ban or tax on using charcoal. The survey was performed under informed consent. A survey company based in Kenya was recruited to collect the data. The questionnaire was composed in English and then translated into the following languages: Kenya—Swahili and Somali; Tanzania—Swahili; Uganda—Luganda and Runyanoke; Rwanda—Kinyarwanda and French; and Ethiopia—Amharic, Tigrinya, Oromo and Somali. These translations were performed by native-speaking translators recruited by the company. The interviews were conducted by 26 experienced enumerators and 5 supervisors using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI), and all responses were recorded with Kobo Toolbox software. Before conducting the interviews, the enumerators completed a two-day training session on the topics in the questionnaire and various techniques for collecting data using the CATI method. A pilot study was conducted in January 2022 with 200 respondents in each of the five focal countries to test the reliability and content validity of the questionnaire. Additionally, the pilot study enabled refining the questionnaire with feedback from both the enumerators and respondents. The company used its existing national databases of respondents involved in earlier investigations to recruit survey respondents in each of the five countries. Screening questions were used to recruit samples that were representative of the adult population in terms of age, gender and area of residence in the five countries. In total, 7,622 respondents were contacted. Following three reminders, a total of 4,766 responses with complete answers (63% response...
Many but not all metadata providers use ELSST Thesaurus for their keywords.
Keywords
Not available
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
17/03/2022 - 28/03/2022
Country
Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Adult population of Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda.
Sampling procedure
Probability: Stratified
Probability
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Interview
Access
Publisher
Swedish National Data Service
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
Access to data through SND. Access to data is restricted.