The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Ranking the rankers: The new industry of influencer relations, 2015-2017
Creator
Pollock, N, University of Edinburgh
Study number / PID
853102 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853102 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This data contains qualitative data investigating how new specialist forms of technical and market expertise have emerged to help organisations respond to potent rankings. New groups of 'influencer relations' experts can be found across industrial sectors. In this project, we have focused on those within the information and communication technology (ICT) area where there is evidence emerging that they have been highly effective in creating opportunities for local influence over global rankings, and that their presence is having consequences for (re)shaping the power of rankings more generally. Yet despite their obvious importance, we still know very little if anything about these experts and the kinds of knowledge they produce or influence they wield. The data set contains transcribed interviews with influencer relations experts as well as industry analysts. These interviews look to understand the major facets of their role, as well as with how they are able to influence industry analyst rankings. The interviews were broadly structured around the four following questions:
1. How are the new technical/market actors that have emerged going about establishing the value of their expertise?
2. What kind of knowledge are these specialists producing and how is it being commodified as part of the construction of a potential market for supplementary goods related to rankings?
3. What are the different calculative practices and technologies used by these actors in carrying out their role?
4. What consequences do these actors’ development and use of new social media technologies have for the reshaping of the broader ranking ecosystem?
The research approach we have adopted is comparative involving analysis of these specialists at a number of different levels. History: We examined the emergence and evolution of this new form of
influencer expertise over time by following its biography from inception through to the modern day. We have traced the birth of influencer...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
15/08/2015 - 30/11/2017
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Event/process
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
The data gathered for this project comprised in-depth semi structured interviews and a small amount of participant observation. Three different sets of actors were interviewed: (i) influencer relations specialists within organisations; (ii) agency-based influencer relations consultants; and (iii) rankers themselves.We undertook 30 semi-structured 1-2 hour interviews of influencer relations professionals both here in the UK and abroad. The sample was derived from the first phase of research. Interviews covered the specific expertise of those involved within the emerging professional group, their views and experiences around the role, the use of existing practices and tools to collect information on rankings, and any issues they face when doing so, etc. These discussions were digitally recorded and fully transcribed according to normal academic standards and conventions. In terms of the more ethnographic parts of the project, the team made 15 visits to the organisation described in the proposal - theInstitute of Industry Analyst Relations (IIAR) - over the 2-year period to carry out observations and ethnographic interviews. We l generate transcriptions and a researcher diary from the monthly‘events’ held at the IIAR. These events are normally presentations (of up to 1 hour in length) given by industry professionals on topics related to the theme of the proposal, typically followed by a question and answer session (approx. 30 minutes) and informal discussions over drinks (approx. 1 hour). Given the location, it was not possible to digitally record all these sessions. For the moreinformal sessions, however, the fieldworker maintained a diary which he completed after (or as soon after) the meetings had finished. We have not attempted full transcriptions of all parts of these meetings as many cover a wide range of themes, only some of which may be relevant to our research questions. The research team has therefore listened to recordings and have transcribed those parts thought to be of potential interest. Physical (paper) diaries were also used during the events. This material was typed up to facilitate its later sharing.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/M007626/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.