Summary information

Study title

Ranking the rankers: The new industry of influencer relations, 2015-2017

Creator

Pollock, N, University of Edinburgh

Study number / PID

853102 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-853102 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This data contains qualitative data investigating how new specialist forms of technical and market expertise have emerged to help organisations respond to potent rankings. New groups of 'influencer relations' experts can be found across industrial sectors. In this project, we have focused on those within the information and communication technology (ICT) area where there is evidence emerging that they have been highly effective in creating opportunities for local influence over global rankings, and that their presence is having consequences for (re)shaping the power of rankings more generally. Yet despite their obvious importance, we still know very little if anything about these experts and the kinds of knowledge they produce or influence they wield. The data set contains transcribed interviews with influencer relations experts as well as industry analysts. These interviews look to understand the major facets of their role, as well as with how they are able to influence industry analyst rankings. The interviews were broadly structured around the four following questions: 1. How are the new technical/market actors that have emerged going about establishing the value of their expertise? 2. What kind of knowledge are these specialists producing and how is it being commodified as part of the construction of a potential market for supplementary goods related to rankings? 3. What are the different calculative practices and technologies used by these actors in carrying out their role? 4. What consequences do these actors’ development and use of new social media technologies have for the reshaping of the broader ranking ecosystem? The research approach we have adopted is comparative involving analysis of these specialists at a number of different levels. History: We examined the emergence and evolution of this new form of influencer expertise over time by following its biography from inception through to the modern day. We have traced the birth of influencer...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

15/08/2015 - 30/11/2017

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Event/process

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

The data gathered for this project comprised in-depth semi structured interviews and a small amount of participant observation. Three different sets of actors were interviewed: (i) influencer relations specialists within organisations; (ii) agency-based influencer relations consultants; and (iii) rankers themselves.We undertook 30 semi-structured 1-2 hour interviews of influencer relations professionals both here in the UK and abroad. The sample was derived from the first phase of research. Interviews covered the specific expertise of those involved within the emerging professional group, their views and experiences around the role, the use of existing practices and tools to collect information on rankings, and any issues they face when doing so, etc. These discussions were digitally recorded and fully transcribed according to normal academic standards and conventions. In terms of the more ethnographic parts of the project, the team made 15 visits to the organisation described in the proposal - theInstitute of Industry Analyst Relations (IIAR) - over the 2-year period to carry out observations and ethnographic interviews. We l generate transcriptions and a researcher diary from the monthly‘events’ held at the IIAR. These events are normally presentations (of up to 1 hour in length) given by industry professionals on topics related to the theme of the proposal, typically followed by a question and answer session (approx. 30 minutes) and informal discussions over drinks (approx. 1 hour). Given the location, it was not possible to digitally record all these sessions. For the moreinformal sessions, however, the fieldworker maintained a diary which he completed after (or as soon after) the meetings had finished. We have not attempted full transcriptions of all parts of these meetings as many cover a wide range of themes, only some of which may be relevant to our research questions. The research team has therefore listened to recordings and have transcribed those parts thought to be of potential interest. Physical (paper) diaries were also used during the events. This material was typed up to facilitate its later sharing.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/M007626/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2019

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available