The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
International Centre for Language and Communicative Development: Defaulting Effects Contribute to the Simulation of Cross-linguistic Differences in Optional Infinitive Errors, 2014-2020
Creator
Freudenthal, D, University of Liverpool
Pine, J, University of Liverpool
Jones, G, Nottingham Trent University
Gobet, F, University of Liverpool
Study number / PID
853921 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853921 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
This paper describes an extension to the MOSAIC model
which aims to increase MOSAIC’s fit to the cross-linguistic
occurrence of Optional Infinitive (OI) errors. While previous
versions of MOSAIC have successfully simulated these errors
as truncated compound finites with missing modals or
auxiliaries, they have tended to underestimate the rate of OI
errors in (some) obligatory subject languages. Here, we
explore defaulting effects, where the most frequent form of a
given verb is substituted for less frequent forms, as an
additional source of OI errors. It is shown that defaulting in
English tends to result in the production of bare forms that are
indistinguishable from the infinitive, while defaulting in
Spanish is less pronounced, and tends to result in the
production of 3rd person singular forms. Dutch verb forms are
dominated by the stem in corpus-wide statistics, and the
infinitive in utterance-final position, suggesting defaulting in
Dutch may change qualitatively across development.
Defaulting is shown to increase MOSAIC’s fit to English and
Dutch without affecting its already good fit to Spanish, and
provides a potential way of simulating the cross-linguistic
pattern of verb-marking errors in children with SLI.The International Centre for Language and Communicative Development (LuCiD) will bring about a transformation in our understanding of how children learn to communicate, and deliver the crucial information needed to design effective interventions in child healthcare, communicative development and early years education.
Learning to use language to communicate is hugely important for society. Failure to develop language and communication skills at the right age is a major predictor of educational and social inequality in later life. To tackle this problem, we need to know the answers to a number of questions: How do children learn language from what they see and hear? What do measures of children's brain activity tell us about what...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2014 - 31/05/2020
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Other
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Other
Data collection mode
In order to determine the potential effects of defaultingacross the three languages, corpora of child-directed speech were analysed to derive counts for the different verb inflections. Counts were collected from a range of speakers. For English, the adult speech directed at all (12) children in the Manchester corpus (Theakston et al. 2001) was pooled. For Dutch, the pooled data from the Groningen corpus (Bol, 1996) was used. The Spanish counts were derived from the corpora of Juan and Lucia from the Nottingham corpus (Aguado-Orea, 2004) and combined with those of the Fern-Aguado corpus.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/L008955/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2021
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.