Summary information

Study title

Reading fluency in normally developed and dyslexic reading: how important is parafoveal versus foveal processing?

Creator

Branigan, H, University of Edinburgh

Study number / PID

850485 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-850485 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This research investigates how differences in dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers' fluency are related to differences in how they process multiple items. When people read, they typically have to process multiple items (eg, letters within words). Research has shown that non-dyslexic readers are more fluent when reading or naming objects aloud when they are presented with more than one item (word or letter) at a time than when items are presented individually, suggesting that they process multiple consecutive items simultaneously. In contrast, dyslexic readers are less fluent when presented with more than one item. This research investigates why this might be so, focusing on three research questions: To what extent does processing for consecutive items overlap? How does such overlapping processing affect fluency? Which specific aspects of multi-item processing are impaired in dyslexia? The research involves recording dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers' eye-movements and voice responses as they name sequences of letters. They investigate whether recognition or retrieval of a letter is influenced by early processing of that letter before it is directly looked at, or by explicit processing once it is directly looked at. They also investigate whether processing is affected by cumulative early and later exposure to a letter.

Keywords

Methodology

Data collection period

01/08/2009 - 31/07/2010

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

Data was collected from individual volunteer participants from University of Edinburgh population who responded to adverts. Collected data was inidividuals' RTs and spoken stimuli names.

Funding information

Grant number

RES-000-22-3533

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2010

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available