The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
The data are in the form of ethnographic fieldnotes pertaining to the daily activities that took place in the central campaign team of a political party that was contesting the 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly Elections over a two-month period. The data sought to capture, inter alia, the sociological profile of the members of the campaign team and their professional motivations, the innovative techniques deployed in a campaign team (with special focus on the role of data and digital media technology), the division of responsibility and delegation of authority between various actors, and assessing the overall efficiency and efficacy of the political campaign. Due to ethical constraints the data cannot be archived.Over the last decade, the nature of election campaigns and political communication around the world has undergone a marked shift. Driving this shift has been the increasing use of new media technology by political parties and their growing reliance on the services of 'spin-doctors', political consulting firms, pollsters, and big data analysts. While these new techniques of electioneering have enabled politicians to target voters to an unprecedented level of precision, it has also given a fillip to the circulation of misinformation and conspiracy theories in the public sphere, promoted the ethically dubious practice of mining of voters' personal information, and led to declining perceptions of electoral fairness. How do we understand these changes? Are they simply the result of technological change alone? Or, do they indicate a much deeper shift in the meaning and practice of democratic politics? And, what implications do these changes have for the future of democracy? Answering these questions forms the central problématique of my research.
To address these questions, my research focuses on electoral and party politics in the world's largest democracy - India. While many scholars and commentators have analysed aforementioned changing nature of...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2021 - 22/02/2022
Country
India
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Organization
Event/process
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Still image
Other
Data collection mode
The primary technique of data collection was participant observation in the campaign team of a political party. This entailed maintaining detailed ethnographic fieldnotes based on my involvement and observation of the day-to-day activities inside the political party’s central campaign team and my interactions with the members of the team (through semi-structured and open-ended interviews). In addition to interacting with party members, I also shadowed different individuals associated with the campaign, such as political consultants, ground-level employees of political consulting firms, public relations experts, pollsters, data analysts, journalists etc. Finally, I was also able to access and analyse data on the political situation in Punjab and the profile of Punjab’s voters that was being generated by the political party through its various channels.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/W006545/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2023
Terms of data access
The Data Collection only consists of metadata and documentation as the data could not be archived due to legal, ethical or commercial constraints. For further information, please contact the contact person for this data collection.