Summary information

Study title

REFIT: Personalised retrofit decision support tools for UK homes using smart home technology. Phase 1: Survey data

Creator

Wilson, C, University of East Anglia
Hargreaves, T, University of East Anglia

Study number / PID

852366 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852366 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

The REFIT project investigated the use of smart home technologies and their potential impact on household energy demand. As part of the REFIT project, a national survey was conducted to measure perceptions of smart homes. The survey instrument was developed and tested by the project team. The survey was implemented online during September - October 2015 by a market research company using a representative sample of UK homeowners. A total of 1054 responses were collected. The survey responses were coded and cleaned by the project team. Both survey instrument and cleaned response data are made available here. The REFIT project additionally ran a field trial of smart home technologies involving twenty households in Loughborough, UK, over a two year period from October 2013 - October 2015. Detailed qualitative data on participating households’ perceptions of smart home technologies are available separately (see Related resources - Related data collections). These data were collected as part of the REFIT project (`Personalised Retrofit Decision Support Tools for UK Homes using Smart Home Technology’). The REFIT project ran from 2012 - 2015 as a consortium of three universities - Loughborough, Strathclyde and East Anglia - and ten industry stakeholders. The REFIT project was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through linked grants under the Transforming Energy Demand in Buildings through Digital Innovation (BuildTEDDI) funding programme. This dataset was collected under Grant Reference EP/K002430/1 to the University of East Anglia. Other linked grants to consortium members includes EP/K002457/1 (Loughborough) and EP/K002368/1 (Strathcldye). Further details on the REFIT project and related publications can be found at: http://www.refitsmarthomes.orgThermal efficiency retrofit options, appliance upgrades and on-site renewables represent a significant opportunity to deliver energy demand reductions to UK homes. The potential to...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/09/2015 - 31/10/2015

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

The survey instrument was developed by the research team to measure: (A) general perceptions of the purpose, benefits and risks of smart home technologies, and general issues of consumer confidence; (B) perceived attributes of smart home technologies including how they are designed, how they are controlled, and the domestic activities for which they are most relevant.The survey instrument was structured in two parts. Part one contained socio-demographic questions and basic questions on smart home awareness used to screen respondents (see below). Part two contained detailed questions measuring smart home perceptions on a 5 point Likert scale (with 5 = strongly agree).All questions were developed, iteratively tested and refined for clarity and comprehensibility prior to implementation. The survey was implemented online by a market research company, SSI, using a respondent panel representative of the UK homeowner population. Survey responses were collected from 18 September - 14 October 2015.Screening questions were included to ensure that survey respondents (i) have at least a vague idea of what smart home technologies are, (ii) own their own home (with or without a mortgage), (iii) are >18 years old. A total of n=125 respondents were screened out for not meeting all three of these criteria.Quality checks were run to identify possible respondents with low cognitive engagement in the survey questions. Quality checks included: (i) straight line responses on blocks of questions; (ii) inappropriate or irrelevant open-ended responses revealing a lack of understanding of questions; (iii) contradictory responses on identical but inversely-framed questions; (iv) unrealistically fast survey completion times. A total of n=593 respondents were filtered out for failing two or more of these quality checks.The final sample comprised n=1025 respondents. The average survey completion was just under 7 minutes.

Funding information

Grant number

EP/K002430/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2016

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available