The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
What Changes When Incentives Change in Primary Medical Care, 2005-2006
Creator
Huby, G., University of Edinburgh, School of Health in Social Science
Guthrie, B., University of Dundee, Tayside Centre for General Practice
Davies, H. T. O., University of St Andrews, School of Management
Study number / PID
5591 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-5591-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The new 2004 General Medical Services (GMS) contract for general practitioners (GPs) exemplified trends across the public services towards increasing definition, measurement and regulation of professional work. Significantly increased resources are now available, with up to one third of GPs' income now dependent on the quality of care they provide measured against 146 clinical and organisational indicators as measured by the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). The central aim of this project was to examine how the organisation and culture of general medical practices both shape and constrain the effects of the 2004 GMS contract in terms of formal structure (contractual relationships between practice staff, and between practice and primary care trust), process (division of work among practice staff, and practice systems for delivering care) and culture (the renegotiation of professional identities and the division of labour, in the context of changing relationships between professions and the state).
The project comprised three key components. The first component involved focus group interviews with a range of primary care professionals in three Scottish health board areas in order to map a broad range of organisational responses to the new GMS contract. The second phase involved ethnographic case studies in two practices in one health board in order to contextualise these responses within particular organisational settings. The third phase of the study involved individual interviews with professionals working at health board level who have been involved in implementing the new contract in order to explore how the new contract has affected other quality improvement work at a regional level and their relationship with the general practices in the region. Main Topics:The dataset comprises qualitative interview transcripts, from three focus groups and 24 individual respondents, and...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/07/2005 - 01/07/2006
Country
Scotland
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
Institutions/organisations
National
Universe
General practice team members and health board managers in Scotland.
Sampling procedure
Purposive selection/case studies
Kind of data
Text
Focus Group transcripts; Semi-structured interview transcripts; Observation field notes
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Observation
Focus group
Funding information
Grant number
RES-153-25-0043
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2007
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.