Summary information

Study title

Constraints on the design of security policy: Companion quantitative survey 2017

Creator

Thomson, C, University of Exeter

Study number / PID

853042 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-853042 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

A companion survey was conducted in April of 2017 (prior to the announcement of the 2017 General Election). The overall objective of the survey is to offer insights about the foreign policy attitudes and security policy preferences of the general UK public. Topics covered include: (1) Identifying what participants consider should be important national foreign policy goals; (2) Identifying what they identify as critical threats to the United Kingdom; (3) Understanding perceptions regarding what the UK’s role in the world should be, including militaristic attitudes and support for national defence; (4) Examining general dispositional approaches that security elites/the general public have towards foreign policy such as multilateralism, unilateralism, and isolationism. The survey was fielded by YouGov with a representative sample of 2,000 UK adults.This project seeks to explain how security policy is developed in the UK, and suggest how relationships between different security and defence agencies can be improved. Security policies protect the borders of a nation-state and the security of its citizens and include military, economic, environmental and cybersecurity policies. These policies are designed and implemented by different agencies including military organizations, the intelligence community, and government departments such as the Cabinet Office and the Ministry of Defence. We live in a fast-paced world where security threats may unexpectedly emerge from state actors such as the Syrian government, or non-state actors such as terrorist organizations. In this rapidly changing security environment it is paramount that national security policies be designed with enough flexibility so as to increase the likelihood of success. Important constraints can hinder this need for flexibility. One such constraint is that members of the security and defence community might fear losing support, appearing as incompetent, or harming the reputation of their agency if they...
Read more

Topics

Methodology

Data collection period

01/04/2017 - 25/04/2017

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

The survey was fielded by YouGov with a representative sample of 2,000 UK adults. To achieve such a sample, YouGov draws a sub-sample of their online panel that is representative of British adults in terms of gender, age, social class and type of newspaper (upmarket, mid-market, red-top, no newspaper), and invites this sub-sample to complete a survey. Once this sample has been identified, email invitations are sent to respondents (only they may participate in the survey, they do not know ahead of time what the topic of the survey will be about, and each respondent can only ever answer each survey once).Once the survey is complete, the data is then statistically weighted to the national profile of all adults (including people without internet access). The data is weighed by age, gender, social class, region, level of education, how respondents voted at the previous election, how respondents voted at the EU referendum and their level of political interest. Targets for the weighted data are derived from four sources: 
1. The census; 2. Large scale random probability surveys, such as the Labour Force Survey, The National Readership survey and the British Election Study; 3. The results of the 2015 general election; 4. Offical ONS population estimates.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/L010879/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2018

Terms of data access

The UK Data Archive has granted a dissemination embargo. The embargo will end in May 2019 and the data will then be available in accordance with the access level selected.

Related publications

Not available