The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Toš, Niko (Univerza v Ljubljani = University of Ljubljana. Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo = Faculty of Sociology, Political Science and Journalism.)
Study number / PID
SJM72 (ADP)
URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADPSJM72 (NUK)
https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SJM72_V1 (doi)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Slovene Public Opinion Survey
Slovenian Public Opinion (SJM) survey series closely resembles the type of General Social Surveys, well known in other countries. The aim is to provide the scientific community with relevant data about changes in subjective perceptions and attitudes of general population. The topics, which are repeated each year, beginning with 1968, are evaluations of general and economic situation in society, interethnic relations in Slovenia and Yugoslavia, politics, ecology and religion. Since 1989, SJM surveys have been involved in cross-national comparative perspectives by adopting and replicating...
First there are questions that deal with social inequality and privileges. Interviewees also select most appropriate measures for reduction of inequality. Next, they express their trust in different vocations and state their opinion about presence of corruption. Questions on League of Communist follow after. Then come questions focusing on elections, voting behaviour, and nomination procedure in general. Next block of questions deals with economic situation of that time. Respondents assess suitability of various measures introduced to speed up economic recovery and express their view on relation between developed and underdeveloped Yugoslav republics. Next chapter deals with interviewees' personal values family, sex roles, friends, material well being, and influence over society. Questions on Yugoslav foreign policy and military security come after. Last chapter is dedicated to attendance to the media. As usually, questionnaire ends with demographic questions.First there are questions that deal with social inequality and privileges. Interviewees also select most appropriate measures for reduction of inequality. Next, they express their trust in different vocations and state their opinion about presence of corruption. Questions on League of Communist follow after. Then come questions focusing on elections, voting behaviour, and nomination procedure in general. Next block of questions deals with economic situation of that time. Respondents assess suitability of various measures introduced to speed up economic recovery and express their view on relation between developed and underdeveloped Yugoslav republics. Next chapter deals with interviewees' personal values family, sex roles, friends, material well being, and influence over society. Questions on Yugoslav foreign policy and military security come after. Last chapter is dedicated to attendance to the media. As usually, questionnaire ends with demographic questions.First there are questions that deal with social...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
02/1972 - 04/1972
Country
Yugoslavia Slovenia
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Institutionalised people.
Sampling procedure
Probability: Cluster: Stratified random
Kind of data
NumericNumeric
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI)
Access
Publisher
Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov = Social Science Data Archives
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The data and materials are licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials.