Summary information

Study title

Do attentional and interpretive biases interact or work independently in vulnerability to emotional stress?

Creator

Mackintosh, B, University of Essex

Study number / PID

851126 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-851126 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Psychological theories emphasise the key role thought processes play in the development and maintenance of anxiety, depression and elation. Studies show that, relative to the general population, anxious / depressed individuals tend to automatically notice negative rather than positive information (attentional bias), and also show this negative tendency when interpreting ambiguous scenarios (Interpretation bias). In contrast, elated individuals show an opposing pattern. To date however, research has primarily examined one bias in isolation to the other, so little is currently known about the potential relationship between them, and how they may also interact with mood. The first study will address this omission, by examining whether attentional and interpretive biases work together or independently in members of the general population. The results will inform current theoretical models regarding bias operation in those with some vulnerability towards mood disorders and those without. It will also inform study two, which aims to optimise Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM): a training programme which ameliorates biases in a positive direction. If it is found the biases work together, provision of either Interpretive or attentional training is expected to be beneficial. If however they are found to work independently, optimising CBM towards the dominant bias will be beneficial.

Keywords

Methodology

Data collection period

30/07/2012 - 29/08/2013

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

Study 1Methodmeasurementsacademic population N=161SPSS 1 filedata variables 88 including Reaction Times, Rating, Questionnaires results Study 2method N=105 Group = 5 data variables 36 including reaction times, rating, Questionnaire results

Funding information

Grant number

ES.J007048.1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2013

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available