Study title

United Kingdom

Individual

• Running a complex ten-step systems thinking process involving the development of causal loop diagrams and in turn future explorative scenarios. Six online workshops were involved at different points of the process and each workshop had break-out sessions with the digital whiteboard tool Miro used to capture notes. This research has been fully written up and published in the journal Futures.• Notes from desk reviews of local transport plans, supplemented in a small number of cases by explorative semi-structured interviews. This information fed into a wider pan-European piece of project work that has been written up and published to reflect a wider review of local transport plans (and Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans in Europe).• Game play data from running a serious card game at various venues where participants were able to explore the merits of triple access planning. The principal purpose of the game plays was not to collect research data but to use the game itself to socialise TAP amongst practitioners. This has been written up and published as part of a special issue on serious games.• Data from running a proprietary Mott MacDonald-UWE strategic planning approach called FUTURES in a simplified form online. The principal purpose was again to offer transport planning stakeholders an exposure to TAP rather than being a method to collect data from. One instance of this involved members of the public where consent was sought beforehand but data was entirely context-specific to the ‘FUTURES Relay’ proprietary approach used. This work has been submitted for possible publication.• Data (transcripts) from a set of 23 semi-structured interviews with transport professionals from partner oganisations in the project. We had a small group of (identifiable) partner organisation representatives who we asked for candid views on the state of transport planning. We foresaw there being sensitive data (such as criticisms of organisations) and that individuals could be identified from the experience they described making data anonymisation impossible. We took the considered view that the ethical solution was instead to achieve a good quality analysis and write-up of the data (valid, trustworthy and rigorous). An academic journal paper based upon these interviews has been published.