Summary information

Study title

Development of Episodic Future Thinking and Future-oriented Decision Making Study, 2016-2019

Creator

McCormack, T, Queen's University Belfast

Study number / PID

854288 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-854288 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

These data stem from five large studies examining the relation between episodic future thinking and delay of gratification in preschoolers, children, and adolescents. Study 1 examined the relation between episodic future thinking and performance on a delay choice task in preschoolers; Study 2 examined whether performance in preschoolers on delay choice was enhanced by encouraging participants to thinking episodically about the future. The results of Studies 1 and 2 indicate that while there may be some relations between delay choice and episodic future thinking in this age group, children this age do not benefit from being primed to think episodically. Studies 3 and 4 examined similar issues in older children. The findings of Study 3 indicated that episodic future thinking is not related to delay choice in this age group, but that a measure of subjective future time was predictive, suggesting that how children represent the distance in time of future events has an impact on whether they decide to delay gratification. Study 4 found that older children, like preschoolers, do not benefit from being primed to think episodically about the future. Study 5 examined such priming in adolescents and adults, and included a novel priming condition in which participants thought about future episodes concerning another person. The findings demonstrated the standard episodic future priming effect in both adolescents and adults but there was no benefit in the novel priming condition. These results suggest that episodic future priming is not beneficial to delay of gratification until the adolescent years, and that such priming must specifically involve thought about the future self.We are often faced with a choice between doing something that has an immediate reward (e.g., spending money on a treat) and doing something that has no immediate benefit but is in the longer-term more advantageous (e.g., saving to buy a house). Choosing the smaller immediate reward over the larger,...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/09/2016 - 31/08/2019

Country

Northern Ireland

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

This project involved a series of five experimental studies. In Studies 1-4, participants were recruited through nursery and primary schools local to the PI's institution in Northern Ireland. The schools sent letters to parents in advance of testing, and only children whose parents consented in writing to their child's participants were included in the studies. Children were asked to provide assent. The population of children was primary drawn from lower to middle class socio-economic status, and were primarily of White ethnic background reflecting the demographics of the local population in Northern Ireland. Testing was conducted individually with each child in nurseries and primary schools by administering a set of experimental tasks. These tasks are described in detail in the Summary file associated with each study. Study 5 was conducted with adolescents and adults. Adolescents were recruited through secondary schools local to the PI's institution. Schools distributed letters to parents and only children whose parents had given written consent were included in the study. Adolescents were also asked to give written consent. The demographics of the adolescent and adult population were similar to that in Studies 1-4. Testing of adolescents was conducted in groups in their schools, and the tasks were experimental tasks that were completed online on school computers. Adults were recruited through Queen's University Belfast and were recruited through email and poster advertisement in the university and provided written consent. Adults were tested either individually or in groups in a research lab using the same set of online tasks that had been administered to adolescents. A detailed description of the experimental tasks is given in the Summary document for Study 5.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/N01281X/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2021

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.

Related publications

Not available