The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Edgar, K., University of Oxford, Centre for Criminological Research
Martin, C., University of Oxford, Centre for Criminological Research
Study number / PID
4596 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-4596-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.By their nature, prisons engender potentially violent conflicts; this research project explored the circumstances which led to violence in prisons; the consequences of violent confrontations for prisoners and staff; and the ways in which conflicts with the potential to lead to violence were resolved without recourse to physical force. This project sought to understand why a particular situation became violent and to what extent the violence was considered to have settled the matter. The study took place in four different types of establishment: a high security prison, a local prison, a women's prison, and a young offender institution. The main aims and objectives were:
1. To analyse inter-personal violence in penal institutions; to explore the circumstances in which conflicts escalate into physical injury or threats to safety.
2. To identify methods of communication, conciliation, or mediation used by staff and inmates to reduce the likelihood of a violent outcome; to outline the interests of perpetrators and victims, how they interpret their actions and the norms that guide their decision-making.
3. To assess the response of the institution and to assess whether the official response played a role in resolving such conflicts.
4. To clarify the conditions under which the use of force by inmates or staff is considered acceptable; to examine the circumstances in which staff decide that 'control and restraint' techniques are required.
5. To compare the forms of violence in different types of population, distinguished by the age, gender and race of prisoners and staff.Main Topics:This data collection utilises both quantitative and qualitative methods.
The quantitative data consists of results from six structured questionnaire surveys collected from prisoners and prison staff; participants in and witnesses to violent incidents in prison. In addition to basic biographical and demographic details,...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/1998 - 01/01/2000
Country
England
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
and incidents
The units of observation in the survey data are individuals
the units of observation for the qualitative data are incidents.
Subnational
Universe
Prisoners and staff of four English penal institutions
Sampling procedure
Purposive selection/case studies
Kind of data
Text
Numeric
The textual data comprised extracts and summaries from in-depth/semi-structured interviews and analyses of violent incidents. The alpha/numeric data comprised coded survey results.
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Funding information
Grant number
L133251042
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2003
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee.
Related publications
Edgar, K. and Martini, C. (2000) 'The social context of prison violence', Criminal Justice Matters, 24-25