The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
We collected Twitter posts that are topically related to three selected elections: the 2015 Venezuela parliamentary election, 2016 Philippines general election and 2016 Ghana general election. Using human annotators and trained classifiers, we built two datasets in tweet-level and incident-level. Tweet-level dataset is consist of annotated tweets, however the incident-level dataset contains grouped tweets and the reported incident details by each group of tweets.
Electoral violence is a common theme in developing countries all around the world where they destabilize basic standards for democratic elections. Violence against candidates, voters,
journalists and election officials can reduce voters’ choices and suppress the vote. Nowadays, social media platforms such as Twitter are popular as a medium for reporting and discussing current news and events, including political events. In particular, by comparing Twitter and newswire for breaking news, found that Twitter leads newswire in reporting political events. Such a conclusion indicates that Twitter is useful for monitoring and studying political events, including elections.
Our datasets enable further electoral violence studies based on social media data, which can provide valuable insights on explaining and mitigating electoral violence.
Elections are a means of adjudicating political differences through peaceful, fair, democratic mechanisms. When elections are beset by violence, these aims are compromised and political crises often result. Despite the undisputed importance of understanding electoral violence, there has been only a limited body of systematic comparative research on this topic. If scholars and practitioners are to gain insight into the dynamics of electoral violence and develop superior strategies for deterring it, better data and more sophisticated theories are required.
The aim of this project is to develop conceptual, methodological and practical tools to facilitate an enhanced...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2016 - 31/03/2018
Country
Venezuela, Ghana, Philippines
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Event/process
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
Machine learning; we collect Twitter posts published by Twitter users during the period of one month before and after the election dates. In order to permit human assessors to identify relevant (election-related) tweets without having to judge millions of tweets, we adopt a TREC-style pooling methodology. We target (1) the 2015 Venezuela parliamentary election that was held on 6 December 2015 to elect the 164 deputies and three indigenous representatives of the National Assembly, (2) the 2016 Ghana General election that was held on 7 December 2016 to elect a President and Members of Parliament and (3) the 2016 Philippines general election that was held on 9 May 2016 for executive and legislative branches for all levels of government - national, provincial, and local, except for thebarangay officials.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/L016435/2
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.