The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Public accountability to residents in contractual urban redevelopment, case study interviews 2015-2018
Creator
Atkinson, R, University of the West of England
Williams, D, University of the West of England
Tallon, A, University of the West of England
Study number / PID
853302 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853302 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
The data file contains anonymised interview transcripts from the PARCOUR Project. The case studies cover the regeneration of Bristol Harbourside, Gloucester Quays and Taunton Firepool in the south-west of England. The folder contains an excel spreadsheet which provides a list of the codes used to describe each quote and 18 separate word documents (six for each case study). Contracts, deeds, by-laws and other regulatory instruments are used as planning tools to regulate actors (from the public, private and civil sectors) involved in the regeneration of previously developed land. PARCOUR argues that contractual relationships create a specific form of governance that have important implications for the democratic legitimacy of projects for Sustainable Urban Development (SUD). More specifically by studying diverse planning tools in Brazil, UK and the Netherlands, PARCOUR will engage in the comparative evaluation of public accountability in relation to residents. It is also important to acknowledge that both the realisation of the public interest through the use of these planning tools and the accountability of the public sector in contractual processes are under researched. This topic is relevant to section 3.2.3 of the Call on 'Governance and Democracy';, specifically to the 'Poverty, inequality and vulnerability'; section in answering 'How governance decisions on the urban environment interact with land, property markets, rights, and the private sector. And the extent to which planning tools take account of these interactions'.
The main outcome of PARCOUR will be the clear evaluation of public accountability, and clear definition of public interest, focusing on dissemination of this knowledge among public authorities with interactive research. The project has 3 phases: 1) Desk research: Understanding different ways in which the public interest is constructed and operationalised in diverse contexts; 2) Field work and analysis: Testing the legitimacy of the planning...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2015 - 31/08/2018
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
The data collection was based on two phases:1. Desktop study to identify key individuals involved in regeneration of three case studies.2. Contact and interview with individuals identified through both stage 1 and information provided through the interviews by interviewees.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/N011333/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.