Summary information

Study title

Psychological profile of the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia, 2020

Creator

Lep, Žan (Oddelek za psihologijo, Filozofska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani)
Hacin Beyazoglu, Kaja (Oddelek za psihologijo, Filozofska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani)
Ilić, Sandra (Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju = Laboratorij za eksperimentalno psihologijo, Odeljenje za psihologiju = Oddelek za psihologijo, Filozofski fakultet = Filozofska fakulteta, Univerzitet u Beogradu = Univerza v Beogradu)
Teovanović, Predrag (Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju = Fakulteta za specialno pedagogiko in rehabilitacijo, Univerzitet u Beogradu = Univerza v Beogradu)
Damnjanović, Kaja (Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju = Laboratorij za eksperimentalno psihologijo, Odeljenje za psihologiju = Oddelek za psihologijo, Filozofski fakultet = Filozofska fakulteta, Univerzitet u Beogradu = Univerza v Beogradu)

Study number / PID

PPROSR20 (ADP)

URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADP:PPROSR20 (NUK)

https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_PPROSR20_V1 (doi)

Data access

Information not available

Series

Not available

Abstract

Rapid population response and compliance with preventive measures are two of the most effective ways to limit the spread of infections in the early stages of an epidemic. The study examines how people perceive information regarding the coronavirus spread, how well informed they are, and how they respond to developments related to the spread of the new coronavirus. More specifically, it examines the extent to which they trust the various representatives and institutions and how credible they find the information received from them. In this regard, the study also examines how these perceptions are related to actual and hypothetical (in the presence of symptoms) compliance with measures to limit the spread of the disease. The study focuses on the perceptions and responses of the population and their connections with self-protective behavior. Due to its long-lasting nature, COVID-19 epidemic is a long-term process linked to dynamic changes in society and psychological responses and behavior of people; therefore, authors were also interested in what are the differences in perceptions and behavior of people in different stages of the epidemic. Therefore, the study was carried out in the form of daily measurements until the end of emergency conditions and additional measurements from March to August 2020. Data file is in Serbian language. Syntax for translating data file into English is available among the accompanying materials. Data in the ADP database are final, while publications are based on preliminary data and therefore deviations in analyses may occur.Rapid population response and compliance with preventive measures are two of the most effective ways to limit the spread of infections in the early stages of an epidemic. The study examines how people perceive information regarding the coronavirus spread, how well informed they are, and how they respond to developments related to the spread of the new coronavirus. More specifically, it examines the extent to which...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

08/03/2020 - 16/08/2020

Country

Serbia

Time dimension

Cross-section

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Minor residents of the Republic of Serbia (verification with the question on the age of the participants), residents without internet access.

Sampling procedure

Non-probability: Availability

Kind of data

NumericNumeric

Data collection mode

Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)

Funding information

Grant number

179033, 179018, P5-0062

Access

Publisher

Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov = Social Science Data Archives

Publication year

2024

Terms of data access

The data and materials are licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials.