The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
A Double-Registration Task Switching Paradigm With Completed And Cue-Only Trials, 2018-2021
Creator
Swainson, R, University of Aberdeen
Prosser, L, University of Aberdeen
Yamaguchi, M, University of Essex
Study number / PID
854364 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-854364 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
STUDY ABSTRACT: This study examined whether preparation and performance can affect our upcoming behaviour in different ways, by examining different types of switch cost following trials that were only prepared (cue-only) or both prepared and performed (completed). In a double-registration cued task-switching procedure, participants responded to the task cue as they prepared the cued task, and to the target as they performed that task, to give switch costs at both cue (preparation) and target (performance). Cue-only trials included only a cue but no target; completed trials included both a cue and a target, and the effects of these two types of trial were assessed at cue and target responses on the following (completed) trial. Two cues were used for each task, so two types of switch cost could be calculated: the cue-switching cost (i.e., switching versus repeating cues when completing the same task) and the task-switching cost (i.e., switching versus repeating tasks, with cues switching in both cases). A different pattern of switch costs being present following completed trials than was present following cue-only trials would indicate that that preparation and performance have differing types of effect on our subsequent behaviour.GRANT ABSTRACT:
In this project we will investigate whether what we "know" and what we "do" have different effects on our subsequent behaviour. We will do this by looking at our ability to switch between different tasks. Specifically, we will compare how difficult it is to switch away from a task that we have either: a) only prepared to perform (we "knew" what the relevant task was but we didn't "do" it), or ii) actually performed (we both "knew" it and "did" it).
In our everyday lives we frequently need to switch between the different rules that guide our behaviour. For instance, when driving a car we might switch rapidly between the following "tasks": visually assessing potential hazards at a junction; accelerating past a tractor;...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2018 - 31/08/2021
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
Participants (primarily undergraduate and postgraduate students) completed a 35-45 min computerised experiment using E-Prime 2.0 which was based on Arrington, Logan, and Schneider’s (2007) dual-registration paradigm but which also included cue-only trials (based on Lenartowicz, Yeung, & Cohen, 2011). Participants were instructed that they would be switching between two tasks: a colour-judgement task and a shape-judgement task. They were informed about which task they should do on every trial by a cue that was presented for 200ms; this was followed by a blank screen. Participants then had to press one of two buttons (with their left hand) to confirm which task they were to perform. On 70% of trials (the “completed” trials), 100ms after they responded to the cue participants were presented with a target (a coloured shape) for 200ms. This was followed with a blank screen until participants responded by pressing one of two buttons (with their right hand) to perform the cued task. There was then a 100ms blank screen until the next trial started. On the remaining 30% of trials (the “cue-only” trials), 100ms after participants responded to the cue the next trial started. There were two cues per task (these were words: COLOUR and HUE for colour-judgement, SHAPE and FORM for shape-judgement). There were four target features per task (red, green, blue, yellow; square, circle, triangle, diamond). Participants responded to both cues and targets using a Cedrus button box and the reaction time and accuracy of responses were measured.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/R005613/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2022
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.