The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
The Transformative Potential of MOOCs and Contrasting Online Pedagogies, 2017-2018
Creator
Kennedy, E, University College London
Study number / PID
854661 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-854661 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This data collection relates to project 3.4 of the Centre for Global Higher Education: The transformative potential of MOOCs and contrasting online pedagogies. The response of higher education systems to the possibilities of digital technologies has been sporadic and localised. System-level initiatives relate more to administration and research than to education, while institution-level responses focus mainly on installing virtual learning environments. One area where digital innovation in HE has been rapid and large-scale is the phenomenon of the spread of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). The top universities in the US, a few in the UK, the EU, the Far East, Australia, and now also in parts of the Global South, have experimented with this form of HE. The transformative potential of MOOCs, while widely forecast, is still uncertain, for several reasons: MOOCs have done little to transform undergraduate education, as some 80 per cent of participants are highly qualified professionals. MOOC affordances and the large-scale participation rates are incompatible with the personal nurturing and scaffolding that supports high quality student learning. Universities and platform developers are still developing the business models they need to make MOOCs sustainable, and financially viable. In order to explore what features of MOOCs have most potential to transform Higher Education, in depth interviews with MOOC participants were conducted online.The last two generations have seen a remarkable world-wide transformation of higher education (HE) into a core social sector with continually expanding local and global reach. Most nations are moving towards, or have already become, 'high participation' HE systems in which the majority of people will be educated to tertiary level. In the UK HE is at the same time a pillar of science and the innovation system, a primary driver of productivity at work, a major employer and a mainstay of cities and regions, and a national export...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
12/11/2015 - 31/12/2018
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Still image
Data collection mode
The study population was online learners with experience of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Purposive sampling was used to identify participants with experience of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), particularly those who fell into the following categories non-graduates, current undergraduates, graduates, postgraduates, professionals. The sample was recruited through a notice placed within several MOOCs ensuring prior experience of MOOC learning. Participants were included in the study if they responded to the notice and subsequent invitation emails and recruitment continued until the point of data saturation. The interviews were conducted online whilst sharing an interactive whiteboard. The interviews lasted approximately one hour and used a participatory approach based on an adapted repertory grid technique. Prior to the interviews, participants were asked to provide around 5 or so names of MOOCs (or other kinds of online learning) they had experienced. At the beginning of the interview they were introduced to a grid on the interactive whiteboard which they could edit if they desired. They were then asked to compare 3 of their MOOCs/online learning experiences and describe how they were similar or different. These constructs then formed one end of an evaluation pole and written on the grid. Participants were then asked to think of the opposite construct, which formed the other end of the evaluation pole. Participants were then asked to place each of the MOOCs/online learning experiences between the two poles to show its relationship to the construct. Finally the participants were asked to place a marker for their ideal online learning experience "My ideal course" between the poles. This process was repeated until the grid was complete or the interview time was up. The interviews were recorded and transcribed and the grids were saved as images.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/M010082/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2021
Terms of data access
The UK Data Archive has granted a dissemination embargo. The embargo will end on 1 July 2023 and the data will then be available in accordance with the access level selected.