Summary information

Study title

The professionalization of human resource management inHong Kong and the United Kingdom

Creator

Roper, I, Middlesex University

Study number / PID

852176 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852176 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This data collection consists of 2 SPSS data files: (1) Survey (Complete) of CIPD members (August 2013) and (2) Survey (Complete) of HK IHRM members (Sept 2013) as well as interview transcriptions with (1) national and sectoral level informants (2) case study and (3) individual informants. The empirical research was conducted in four distinct stages using mixed methodology: (10 Comparative documentary analysis of policy statements, professional standards and ethical codes of the IHRM and CIPD; (2) Elite interviews with senior representatives of the CIPD and IHRM ascertaining the role that the professional bodies play in shaping the field of HRM, how the new standards came into being, the role of ethics codes and future prospects; (3) Two paired electronic questionnaire surveys of HR practitioners to gauge (a) the levels and range of activities HR practitioners are involved with and (b) attitudes and interactions with others to assess their level of influence; and (4) Case study interviews examining the explanations behind participants’ activities, experiences of HR practice.

An investigation into the the capabilities, activities and organisational status of HR practitioners in the UK and Hong Kong. The aim is to identify the attributes that could be considered professional. The study consists of interviews with national-level stakeholders representing those who may interact with HR practitioners, two paired questionnaire surveys of members of the professional HR bodies in each country/economy and a series of organisational case studies in each country/economy.

Methodology

Data collection period

21/09/2012 - 28/02/2015

Country

United Kingdom, Hong Kong

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Organization

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

Survey conducted with support of CIPD and Hong Kong IHRM membership databases, via email (CIPD) and in hard copy (IHRM). National level Interviews were selected on basis of representativeness and then contextualised. Case study selection was by volunteers from survey plus additional contacts via snowballing. All case studies are contextualised and any organisation potentially representative.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/J017299/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2016

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collections to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to do the data. Once permission is obtained, please forward this to the ReShare administrator.

Related publications

Not available