The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Resisting Subjugation: Law and Power amongst the Santal of India and Bangladesh, 2002-2004
Creator
Shariff, F., University of Warwick, School of Law
Study number / PID
5380 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-5380-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.This is an enhanced qualitative study.
The study uses mixed methods and focuses on the Santal adivasi (tribal people) in Jharkhand, India and Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Anthropological and sociological data collection methods were used to collect material in four villages, three courts of law and from academics and activists.
The focus of the data collection was to find evidence of how disempowered tribal people were able or not able to use the law to their advantage. A broad definition of law was used which acknowledged that the subjects of the research lived by a plurality of laws (state law, their customary law and norms directing their relationships in the village and the home). The main focus of the study was to understand how individuals related to these different laws and legal orders and the factors that affected their empowerment or disempowerment through law.
The collection has been enhanced by the conversion of the qualitative data from Atlas.ti software to RTF format. The Atlas.ti files underwent checks and editing before conversion and are also available for dissemination; enabling data manipulation and querying within the database.Main Topics:The quantitative data consist of results from 48 structured questionnaire interviews with villagers with equal numbers of men and women, divided by age into two categories (20-49 and 50+) and by status (determined by wealth, assets, family size, ability to affect decisions by village chief or other influentials). Data were collected from four villages (two from Bangladesh, two from India) of which one from each country would be a mixed village (where Santal cohabited with Muslims and Hindus and other 'adivasi') and the other a majority Santal village.
The qualitative data comprise: transcripts and notes from unstructured interviews with academics and activists working on tribal rights issues in India and Bangladesh; notes from...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
Not available
Country
Bangladesh, India
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
Cross-national
Subnational
Universe
Judges in 3 courts; villagers in 4 villages; academics in Dhaka and Kolkata; activists in Dhaka, Rajshahi, Kolkata, Delhi and Santal Parganas between 2002-2004
Sampling procedure
One-stage stratified or systematic random sample
Purposive selection/case studies
Kind of data
Text
Numeric
Semi-structured interview transcripts; Focus Group transcripts; Interview notes; Unstructured/semi-structured diaries; Observation field notes; Case study notes
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Focus group
Funding information
Grant number
R42200134457
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2006
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.