The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Lewis, A., University of Bath, School of Humanities and Social Sciences
Study number / PID
4011 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-4011-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The aims and objectives of the project were as follows:
to provide information about investors, particularly ethical/green investors, in order to determine whether people are prepared to incur economic costs in expressing their preferences;
to critically examine the authenticity of ethical and green trusts;
to assess the likely impact of ethical green investment on policy;
to contribute to the development of economic psychology.
This study used a mixture of quantitative and qualitative methodology. The methods employed included a questionnaire study of ethical investors; 50 interviews and discussions with key personnel in the ethical/green investment movement; a case study of the workings of Friends Provident Stewardship; 14 focus group discussions (comprising on average seven participants each) with 45 non-ethical investors and 49 ethical/green investors; 20 telephone interviews with investors who specifically take a financial loss in investing ethically; and finally a computer simulation study of the investment choices of 27 'ethical' investors and 29 'standard' investors.
For the second edition of the study (2003), qualitative material (the 14 focus group discussions) not previously included in the UKDA dataset, was added to the study.Main Topics:The dataset comprises the replies of 1146 ethical/green investors to a six-page questionnaire. Questions covered: investors' willingness to take a financial loss to invest ethically; their preferences for the form ethical/green investing should take as well as their more general attitudes and perceptions. Demographic information includes political and pressure group affiliation, age, occupation and the proportion of their investments made ethically.
The additional element of transcriptions from 13 of the focus groups addresses a similar range of issues with further reference to the respondents' personal interests, family relationships and other...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/1997
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
National
Investors
Universe
Ethical/green investors drawn from a random sample of Friends Provident and NPI investors across the United Kingdom in 1997.
Sampling procedure
Simple random sample
Kind of data
Text
Numeric
Data collection mode
Postal survey
Questionnaires were sent out with the regular newsletters of the Unit Trusts concerned. Focus group discussions were also held.
Funding information
Grant number
L122251017
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
1999
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.
Related publications
Mackenzie, C. and Lewis, A. (2000) 'Support for Investor Activism among U.K. Ethical Investors', Journal of Business Ethics, 215-222