Summary information

Study title

Self-referencing in the Classroom, 2020-2023

Creator

Cunningham, S, Abertay University
McLean, J, Abertay University
Ross, J, University of Dundee
March, J, University of Strathclyde
Golden, K, Abertay University
Wilks, C, University of Nottingham
Ahmed, Z, Abertay University

Study number / PID

856609 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-856609 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

This data collection comprises seven experimental studies that assesses the effects of self-referential cues (e.g., the personal pronoun ‘you’) on children’s learning and processing. There are three experiments focused on numeracy processing in word problems, three experiments looking at literacy processing in close reading tasks, and a final experiment exploring the learning of new information. In the numeracy experiments, we presented 7- to 11-year-old children with arithmetic word problems (e.g., “Eve has 5 apples. Jane has 2 apples more than Eve. How many marbles does Eve have?”), half of which replaced one character name with the self-referent pronoun ‘you’. In the first two experiments, we found that when problems included the self-referent pronoun, they tended to elicit faster and more accurate responses from children. Further, these effects were most pronounced in difficult conditions (e.g., in subtraction rather than addition problems, and when wording is inconsistent rather than consistent with the operation required). We followed up these behavioural experiments with an eye-tracking study, monitoring the length of time that gaze was fixated on specific words within the mathematical word problems. Fixation times showed that children spent significantly less time looking at self-referent pronouns than those referring to another person. This suggests that the effects of self-referent pronouns arise because self-cues facilitate the processing of relevant information, reducing working memory load in problem-solving. In the literacy studies, we tested the effects of self-pronouns on text processing in 9- to 11-year-old children, in the context of close reading tasks. Across three experiments, we trialled different types of passages and questions, different numbers of characters, and different positions of the self-pronoun, as well as presenting questions with the close reading text present or absent onscreen. Findings were mixed, with some initial...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

31/05/2020 - 30/05/2023

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric
Text
Still image

Data collection mode

All experiments conducted in person in schools. Lockdowns associated with the COVID pandemic led us to pilot online materials and testing sessions, but we found online data collection to be challenging with children so our reported data were all collected in person when schools permitted. The resultant time-pressures meant we used a combination of individual and small group testing, both of which were effective. Tasks were delivered using a combination of EPrime and Gorilla programmes and paper-based tasks, as follows:Numeracy i (Effects of tracking and position): Individual data collection using EPrime; Numeracy ii (Effects of difficulty): Small group data collection using Gorilla; Numeracy iii (Eye tracking study): Individual data collection using EPrime and Tobii; Literacy i (Effects of referent position): Small group data collection using Gorilla; Literacy ii (Effects of tracking): Small group data collection using Gorilla; Literacy iii (Effects of text presence): Individual data collection using Gorilla; Learning i (Effects of encoding condition): Small group data collection using paper-based tasks.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/T000465/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2023

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.

Related publications

Not available