The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Individual datasets that do not belong to any series.
Abstract
The survey study charted housing preferences of residents in rural-urban fringe areas of the Finnish towns Kajaani, Oulu, Seinäjoki and Tampere. The study is part of the Academy of Finland's "Future of Living and Housing" (ASU-LIVE) research programme, and the Academy has also funded the study. The first questions examined the respondents' current household composition and type of accommodation, possible holiday home, and whether they have had control over the build materials, plumbing and heating in their accommodation. More detailed questions were asked about the type of heating in the accommodation as well as energy efficiency. Respondents were asked to assess their residential area in terms of overall satisfaction, personal safety, traffic safety, street lighting, peacefulness, closeness to nature, reputation, construction density, and public transport. It was also enquired whether new buildings in the residential area fit in with older buildings and the landscape, as well as whether new housing had made the residential area better in terms of services and public transport, for example. Next, the respondents' work commute distance and duration were charted as well as the mode of transportation to work. Perceived distance and the chosen mode of transportation from home to different types of services was also examined. Satisfaction with traffic infrastructure was examined with questions regarding, for instance, whether it is necessary to own a car in the residential area and whether roads as well as pedestrian and bicycle paths are in good condition. The respondents' rationale for choosing their current residential area was examined extensively with different types of questions and attitudinal statements. They were also asked about the type of residential area that they would live in if they could choose freely. Finally, views on urban and rural life and identity were charted. Background variables included gender, age, household composition, type of...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
06/2013 - 17/07/2013
Country
Finland
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Household
Universe
Adult residents and households in selected districts of Kajaani, Oulu, Seinäjoki and Tampere
Sampling procedure
Total universe/Complete enumeration
Kind of data
Quantitative
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
Access
Publisher
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Publication year
2018
Terms of data access
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Related publications
Muilu, Toivo & Mäntysalo, Raine & Vihinen, Hilkka (2014). Balancing Local Politics, Housing Preferences and Sustainability in the New Detached Housing Areas in the Rural-Urban Interaction Zones (BALANCE) [online]. Helsinki: Academy of Finland. http://www.aka.fi/globalassets/awanhat/documents/tiedostot/asuminen/research-projects/asu-muilu-small.pdf [cited 23.10.2018]