The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Holmberg, Sören (Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg)
Statistics Sweden
Study number / PID
snd0750-1-1.0 (SND)
https://doi.org/10.5878/002515 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This is the fourteenth election study carried out in Sweden in connection with a Swedish general election. Many of the questions are replications of questions asked in one or several of the previous surveys, but there are also a number of questions not asked before. The interview included questions on how much the respondent takes part of political matters in mass media; political interest in general and political discussions among family and friends; important issues when deciding how to vote; and preferred formation of the government after the election as well as person preferred as prime minister. There were also a number of questions on the opinions of the political parties regarding: employment, environment, taxes, the Swedish economy, energy and nuclear power, foreign affairs and security policy, social safety, old-age care, the European Union, refugees, law and order, equality between men and women, education and child care. Political parties and party leaders were to be placed on a scale ranging from strongly dislike to strongly like. Respondents also had to give their opinion on the Social democratic party and the Conservative party and their party leaders with regard to how reliable, inspiring, and sympathetic they are and how much they know about what ordinary people likes. The respondents also had to state how much confidence they had in Swedish politicians. A number of questions dealt with party preference; vote in the September elections; things important when choosing party; votes in earlier elections. As in earlier election studies the respondent had to place the political parties on a political left-right scale. In this survey the political parties also had to be placed on a scale concerning their opinion towards EMU. The respondent also had to place herself/himself on these scales.
Purpose:
Explain why people vote as they do and why an election ends in a particular way. Track and follow trends in the Swedish electoral democracy and make...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
17/08/1998 - 20/09/1998
Country
Sweden
Time dimension
Longitudinal: Panel
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Individuals aged 18-80 years, residing in Sweden and eligible to vote in the parliamentary election 1998.
Sampling procedure
Probability: Simple random
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
The field work was carried out in two stages. Half of the sample was contacted before the election, while the other half was interviewed after the election. The people who were interviewed before the election had to answer a short mail survey shortly after the election day. The survey contained questions about how they voted in the various elections, whether they followed the party leader hearings and the party leader debate on TV and how they experienced the election campaign.
Face-to-face interview
Face-to-face interview
Access
Publisher
Swedish National Data Service
Publication year
2001
Terms of data access
Access to data through SND. Access to data is restricted.