The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Hidden crisis project: in-depth qualitative social science survey of community water management arrangements in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda 2017-2018
Creator
Cleaver, F, University of Sheffield
Whaley, L, University of Sheffield
Mwathunga, E, University of Malawi
Owor, M, Makerere University
Kebede, S, Addis Ababa University
Tayitu, Y, Addis Ababa University
Banda, S, University of Malawi
Study number / PID
854314 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-854314 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
In developing countries, the dominant model for managing rural water supplies is a community-level association or committee. Although a relative paucity of evidence exists to support this model, it continues to exert a strong pull on policy makers. The Hidden Crisis Survey 2 dataset is the major dataset developed by the project. A social science and physical science survey were conducted in tandem, examining the physical waterpoint and the arrangement the community had devised for managing it. The detailed physical and social science datasets developed by the survey were intended to be used to: better understand the multi-faceted factors which underlie water source failure, their everyday governance arrangements, and to explore the inter-relations between the water point governance arrangements, engineering choice and performance, and groundwater resource conditions. The social science survey moved beyond the more standard preoccupation with examining waterpoint committees (a focus on form) to instead examine context-specific water management arrangements (based on the functions needed for sustainable and equitable management). The survey produced a detailed social science dataset of the arrangements communities have devised for managing their waterpoint across 150 sites in Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda, surveyed in 2017 and the early part of 2018 (fieldwork was staggered across the three project countries to time with their dry seasons). The findings challenge many of the normative assumptions in the literature about community based management of water and help to move the debate on to more productive areas of enquiry.Extending and sustaining access to safe and reliable water services remains central to improving the health and livelihoods of poor people, particularly women, in Africa. Here an estimated 350 million rural inhabitants still have no form of safe drinking water, and depend on poor quality unreliable sources for all their domestic needs. Improving...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/05/2015 - 31/10/2015
Country
Ethiopia, Malawi, Uganda
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Family
Family: Household family
Household
Housing Unit
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Two days were spent at each project site. In each country, a project field researcher conducted the following: 1) participatory village mapping, 2) focus groups and one-on-one interviews with water managers, local authority figures, and water users, 3) transect walks. The second survey day finished with a feedback and response session with community members. Interviews were conducted with district water officers before undertaking the survey in each project district. All methods were written up by the field researchers on Microsoft Word and stored on NVIVO. Please see attachments for details of methods listed here.The individual community waterpoints and their related water management arrangements were selected using a purposive sampling approach (see attachment for details of sampling strategy). In each community, purposive sampling was employed to identify research participants for the various social science methods. Focus groups comprise 6 - 10 participants and focused on water managers and authority figures, as well as regular water users. As women are typically responsible for collecting and using water for domestic use, efforts were made to include women and to ensure their voices were heard during interviews and focus groups.
Funding information
Grant number
NE/M008738/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2020
Terms of data access
The UK Data Archive has granted a dissemination embargo. The embargo will end in April 2021 and the data will then be available in accordance with the access level selected.