Summary information

Study title

Data annex for the Descriptive, Text and Network Analyses

Creator

A. Berti Suman (Tilburg University)

Study number / PID

doi:10.17026/dans-zre-t3hd (DOI)

easy-dataset:161131 (DANS-KNAW)

Data access

Information not available

Series

Not available

Abstract

Descriptive, Text and Network Analyses perfromed for the doctoral project "Sensing the risk. In search of the factors influencing the policy uptake of citizen sensing"Summary‘Citizen sensing’, framed as grassroots-driven monitoring initiatives based on sensor technology, is increasingly entering the debate on environmental risk governance. When lay people distrust official information or just want to fill data gaps, they may resort to sensors and data infrastructures to visualize, monitor and report risks caused by environmental factors to public health. Although through a possible initial conflict, citizen sensing may ultimately have the potential to contribute to institutional risk governance. The practice, manifesting claims based on individual rights such as the right to live in a healthy environment and the right to access environmental information, brings the promise to make risk governance more transparent and accountable. Whereas studies on broader citizen science and on citizen sensing often focus on the learning gains for the participants, this thesis rather explores the potential for the sensing citizens to concretely influence risk governance through policy uptake. It inquires ‘which factors contribute to the policy uptake of community-led citizen sensing, responding to a risk and eventually generated by distrust, and which interventions are needed for citizen sensing to complement institutional risk governance’. This complementary potential is assessed by empirically researching the policy uptake of citizen sensing and the influence of factors such as the technology element, the grassroots’ drive, the risk element, distrust and social uptake on this outcome. A number of case studies are investigated adopting a combination of methods, including ethnographical research (on two selected cases), descriptive analysis and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (on a larger set of cases). The cases are analysed through a theoretical framework built on...
Read more

Topics

Not available

Methodology

Data collection period

Not available

Country

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Not available

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Not available

Data collection mode

Not available

Access

Publisher

Tilburg Law School

Publication year

2020

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available