Summary information

Study title

Sustainable Poverty Alleviation From Coastal Ecosystem Services: Household Survey in Kenya and Mozambique, 2013-2017

Creator

Schulte-Herbrüggen, B, Stockholm Resilience Centre
Daw, T, Stockholm Resilience Centre
Wamukoto, A, Wildlife Conservation Society, Kenya
Ribeiro, E, University Eduardo Mondlane
Chaigneau, T, University of Exeter
Coulthard, S, Northumbria University
Hicks, C, Stanford University
Brown, K, University of Exeter
Sandbrook, C, University of Cambridge
Januchowski-Hartley, F, University of Exeter
Owuor, B, KEFRI (Kenya Forestry)
Kraft, F, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich

Study number / PID

852902 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852902 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

The objective of this research was to elicit data required for a quantitative assessment of the contribution of ecosystem services to wellbeing of the poor through a large standardized household survey administered to individuals.The survey was conducted in Kenya and Mozambique. The household survey aimed to sample a total of 1,200 household (600 household per country) and interview up to three people per household. The three respondents included the household head, spouse and a third randomly selected person in order to collect data on individual (i.e.) sub household access to ES.This project aims to better understand the links between ecosystem services (ES) and wellbeing in order to design and implement more effective interventions for poverty alleviation. We do this in the context of coastal, social-ecological systems in two poor African countries; Kenya and Mozambique. Despite recent policy and scientific interest in ES, there remain important knowledge gaps regarding how ecosystems actually contribute to wellbeing, and thus poverty alleviation. Following the ESPA framework, distinguishing ecological processes, 'final ES', 'capital inputs', 'goods' and 'values', this project is concerned with how these elements are interrelated to produce ES benefits, and focuses specifically on how these benefits are distributed to (potentially) benefit the poor, enhancing their wellbeing. We thus address the ESPA goal of understanding and promoting ways in which benefits to the poorest can be increased and more people can meet their basic needs, but we also identify conflicted tradeoffs, i.e. those which result in serious harm to either the ecosystem or poor people and which need urgent attention. Several fundamental questions are currently debated in international scientific and policy fora, relating to four major global trends which are likely to affect abilities of poor people to access ES benefits: (1) devolution of governance power and its impacts on local governance...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/09/2013 - 31/08/2017

Country

Kenya, Mozambique

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Household
Housing Unit
Geographic Unit

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric
Text
Still image

Data collection mode

A structured questionnaire interview was used to collect the the data. The questionnaire covered the following section: subjective wellbeing, vulnerability, basic needs assessment, census data, general livelihoods information and detailed monetary and non-montary income from ecosystem services and other sources, cultural ecosystem services, food consumption and household assets. Three people were interviewed per household. The three respondents included the household head, spouse and a third randomly selected person in order to collect data on individual (i.e.) sub household access to ES.

Funding information

Grant number

NE/K010484/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2022

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available