The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Toš, Niko (Univerza v Ljubljani = University of Ljubljana. Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo = Faculty of Sociology, Political Science and Journalism.)
Study number / PID
SJM84 (ADP)
URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADPSJM84 (NUK)
https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SJM84_V1 (doi)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Slovene Public Opinion Survey
Slovenian Public Opinion (SJM) survey series closely resembles the type of General Social Surveys, well known in other countries. The aim is to provide the scientific community with relevant data about changes in subjective perceptions and attitudes of general population. The topics, which are repeated each year, beginning with 1968, are evaluations of general and economic situation in society, interethnic relations in Slovenia and Yugoslavia, politics, ecology and religion. Since 1989, SJM surveys have been involved in cross-national comparative perspectives by adopting and replicating...
First interviewees compare their standard of living with that of five years previous. Next bloc focuses on political system in general, role of League of Communists, and membership in political organizations. Questions on attitudes toward work, compensation, and values follow next. Interviewees also give their satisfaction with pay, express their view on justification of differences in income and on policy that promotes employment of juveniles. Next in a line, there are questions covering problems of electricity supply, with few questions dedicated to Nuclear power plant Krško. Questions that focus on acceptability of public loan for construction of hydroelectric power stations follow after. Bloc on international affairs comes next. Extensive chapter examines respondents' reading habits, listening to the radio, and watching TV. Last part brings forward questions on religiosity. Demographic questions end the questionnaire.First interviewees compare their standard of living with that of five years previous. Next bloc focuses on political system in general, role of League of Communists, and membership in political organizations. Questions on attitudes toward work, compensation, and values follow next. Interviewees also give their satisfaction with pay, express their view on justification of differences in income and on policy that promotes employment of juveniles. Next in a line, there are questions covering problems of electricity supply, with few questions dedicated to Nuclear power plant Krško. Questions that focus on acceptability of public loan for construction of hydroelectric power stations follow after. Bloc on international affairs comes next. Extensive chapter examines respondents' reading habits, listening to the radio, and watching TV. Last part brings forward questions on religiosity. Demographic questions end the questionnaire.First interviewees compare their standard of living with that of five years previous. Next bloc focuses on political system in...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
08/1984 - 09/1984
Country
Yugoslavia Slovenia
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Institutionalised people.
Sampling procedure
Probability: Cluster: Stratified random
Kind of data
NumericNumeric
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI)
Access
Publisher
Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov = Social Science Data Archives
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The data and materials are licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials.