The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Individual datasets that do not belong to any series.
Abstract
The survey charted the consumption of and attitudes towards the mass media in Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russia. It also queried on which channels people use to obtain information. Firstly, the respondents were asked about their habits of reading newspapers. They were asked how often they read different newspapers and how they obtained them. Opinions on preferred newspaper choices were probed. The respondents also evaluated which newspapers usually contained incorrect information and which ones had correct information. Local (Karelian) and national (Russian) newspapers were treated as separate variable groups. The respondents were asked what kind of topics or sections they preferred reading. Different alternatives included politics, economy, entertainment and letters to the editor. The frequency of listening to radio and watching television was examined. Attitudes towards mass media in general were charted. First, the respondents were asked what they thought the primary purpose of mass media was. They were presented with a set of attitudinal statements about journalists. The respondents were also asked how interested they were in following political news and which information sources they used to follow different kinds of news (political and economic). Opinions on the reliability of the mass media in reporting on these issues were probed. The respondents assessed whether local media were dependent on the authorities of the city and the Republic, and what kind of influence the media had on citizens in general. They were also asked whether the contents of publications should be controlled and whether they were going to vote in the next presidential elections (2000). Those who intended to vote were asked to state their candidate of choice. Background variables included gender, age, level of education, household size, nationality, employment status, industry of employment, income of one member of the household, financial circumstances of the household in...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
04/02/2000 - 28/02/2000
Country
Russia
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
People aged 18 and over living in Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia
Sampling procedure
Probability: Stratified: Proportional
Kind of data
Quantitative
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Access
Publisher
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Publication year
2004
Terms of data access
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Related publications
Pietiläinen, Jukka (2002). The Regional Newspaper in Post-Soviet Russia: Society, Press and Journalism in the Republic of Karelia 1985-2001. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Pietiläinen, Jukka (2003). Media Audiences in a Russian Province. Nordicom Information 25(3), 31-39.
Pietiläinen, Jukka (2003). Media Audiences in a Russian Province. Nordicom Review 24(1), 79-87.
Pietiläinen, Jukka (2003). Sanomalehdistö ja lehtiä lukeva yleisö Karjalan tasavallassa. Idäntutkimus 10(2), 18-27.