The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Prisoners on Prisons: Experiences of Peer-Delivered Suicide Prevention Work, 2020-2021
Creator
Tomczak, P, University of Nottingham
Buck, G, University of Chester
Study number / PID
855867 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-855867 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This is qualitative data from a focus group conducted in September 2020 within a study that examined how the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman (seek to) effect change in prisons following prisoner suicides and how death investigations could have more impact on prison policy and practice. The study ran from 2019-2021.
Within this project, a focus group was conducted with former prisoners in England and Wales (n=5):
Across jurisdictions, prisoner suicide rates consistently exceed those amongst comparable groups in the general population (Zhong et al., 2021). Deaths in coercive institutions threaten the right to life, which is ‘the most fundamental of all human rights [and a] condition of the enjoyment of other rights’ (Owen and Macdonald, 2015: 121). The high rates of suicide and self-harm in prison are of international concern (Dear, 2006). Prison suicide reduction has been designated a priority activity by the World Health Organisation (2007) and England and Wales’ Ministry of Justice (2016). generating very significant harm and costs (Roulston et al., 2021; Author, 2021). Peer support is part of the (international) response to suicidal prisoners, but too little is known about the experience of these interventions.
For data storage and analysis purposes the transcript has been carefully anonymised with any potentially identifiable details removed. Within the transcript the 5 former prisoners have deliberately not been differentiated between to protect their identity. Because of the sensitivity of this research, transcripts of follow up support and analysis groups have been omitted due to the participants still being identifiable following transcript anonymisation.
Further information about the project and links to publications are available on the University of Nottingham SafeSoc project webpage
https://www.safesoc.co.ukIn May 2019, Dutch courts refused to deport an English suspected drug smuggler, citing the potential for inhuman and degrading...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2020 - 01/01/2021
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Our methods included i) focus groups (Liamputtong, 2011) and ii) collaborative autoethnography, which uses personal experiences as data and involves sharing accounts to support deeper analysis of sociocultural experiences (Gant et al., 2019). Our initial focus group in September 2020 was attended by all 8 authors, via the Microsoft Teams online platform. After this focus group, all authors were invited to write reflections. One month later, we discussed these together. Four hour-long online meetings took place between October 2020 and January 2021, to clarify themes as a group and acknowledge distress. This data is excluded from this set to protect anonymity. Within this project, n=5 former prisoners and 3 academics participated in a focus group exploring peer led suicide prevention work. Our research question came from a former prisoner co-author, who felt that too little criminological literature represented the realities of people’s lived experiences. The former prisoner co-author theorised that writing co-produced by people with experience of prison could lead to new forms of knowledge and suggested a study bringing together academics and prisoners to explore the lived experience of prison peer supporters. The academics suggested ‘participatory action research’ (PAR) methodology, which assumes that people impacted by a topic should be co-researchers (Valenzuela, 2016: 149). The primary focus group (this data set) was held online via MS teams. The lead researcher prompted discussion with an open question, asking how former prisoner authors learned they could volunteer in suicide prevention and what motivated them to take part. The ensuing 100-minute discussion was ‘unstructured’, to centre those most impacted. The sample was purposive, as appropriate for our exploratory analysis, however the sample is not representative of all Prison peer supporters in England and Wales.
Funding information
Grant number
MR/T019085/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2022
Terms of data access
The UK Data Archive has granted a dissemination embargo. The embargo will end on 21 July 2024 and the data will then be available in accordance with the access level selected.