Summary information

Study title

Prisoners on Prisons: Experiences of Peer-Delivered Suicide Prevention Work, 2020-2021

Creator

Tomczak, P, University of Nottingham
Buck, G, University of Chester

Study number / PID

855867 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-855867 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This is qualitative data from a focus group conducted in September 2020 within a study that examined how the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman (seek to) effect change in prisons following prisoner suicides and how death investigations could have more impact on prison policy and practice. The study ran from 2019-2021. Within this project, a focus group was conducted with former prisoners in England and Wales (n=5): Across jurisdictions, prisoner suicide rates consistently exceed those amongst comparable groups in the general population (Zhong et al., 2021). Deaths in coercive institutions threaten the right to life, which is ‘the most fundamental of all human rights [and a] condition of the enjoyment of other rights’ (Owen and Macdonald, 2015: 121). The high rates of suicide and self-harm in prison are of international concern (Dear, 2006). Prison suicide reduction has been designated a priority activity by the World Health Organisation (2007) and England and Wales’ Ministry of Justice (2016). generating very significant harm and costs (Roulston et al., 2021; Author, 2021). Peer support is part of the (international) response to suicidal prisoners, but too little is known about the experience of these interventions. For data storage and analysis purposes the transcript has been carefully anonymised with any potentially identifiable details removed. Within the transcript the 5 former prisoners have deliberately not been differentiated between to protect their identity. Because of the sensitivity of this research, transcripts of follow up support and analysis groups have been omitted due to the participants still being identifiable following transcript anonymisation. Further information about the project and links to publications are available on the University of Nottingham SafeSoc project webpage https://www.safesoc.co.ukIn May 2019, Dutch courts refused to deport an English suspected drug smuggler, citing the potential for inhuman and degrading...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/09/2020 - 01/01/2021

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

Our methods included i) focus groups (Liamputtong, 2011) and ii) collaborative autoethnography, which uses personal experiences as data and involves sharing accounts to support deeper analysis of sociocultural experiences (Gant et al., 2019). Our initial focus group in September 2020 was attended by all 8 authors, via the Microsoft Teams online platform. After this focus group, all authors were invited to write reflections. One month later, we discussed these together. Four hour-long online meetings took place between October 2020 and January 2021, to clarify themes as a group and acknowledge distress. This data is excluded from this set to protect anonymity. Within this project, n=5 former prisoners and 3 academics participated in a focus group exploring peer led suicide prevention work. Our research question came from a former prisoner co-author, who felt that too little criminological literature represented the realities of people’s lived experiences. The former prisoner co-author theorised that writing co-produced by people with experience of prison could lead to new forms of knowledge and suggested a study bringing together academics and prisoners to explore the lived experience of prison peer supporters. The academics suggested ‘participatory action research’ (PAR) methodology, which assumes that people impacted by a topic should be co-researchers (Valenzuela, 2016: 149). The primary focus group (this data set) was held online via MS teams. The lead researcher prompted discussion with an open question, asking how former prisoner authors learned they could volunteer in suicide prevention and what motivated them to take part. The ensuing 100-minute discussion was ‘unstructured’, to centre those most impacted. The sample was purposive, as appropriate for our exploratory analysis, however the sample is not representative of all Prison peer supporters in England and Wales.

Funding information

Grant number

MR/T019085/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2022

Terms of data access

The UK Data Archive has granted a dissemination embargo. The embargo will end on 21 July 2024 and the data will then be available in accordance with the access level selected.

Related publications

Not available